Github user mtunique commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3756#discussion_r142308699
--- Diff:
flink-libraries/flink-ml/src/test/scala/org/apache/flink/ml/regression/MultipleLinearRegressionITSuite.scala
---
@@ -75,15 +75,16 @@ class
Github user mtunique closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3719
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user mtunique commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3720
@StephanEwen I think it is the best way to solve this issue. I will follow
the suggestion.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user mtunique commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3720#discussion_r113186869
--- Diff: docs/Gemfile.lock ---
@@ -30,18 +30,19 @@ GEM
redcarpet (~> 3.1)
safe_yaml (~> 1.0)
toml (~&
Github user mtunique commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3720#discussion_r113186880
--- Diff: docs/Gemfile.lock ---
@@ -30,18 +30,19 @@ GEM
redcarpet (~> 3.1)
safe_yaml (~> 1.0)
toml (~&
Github user mtunique commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3719
@patricklucas I have changed this PR follow #3751. In order to make the PRs
clearly, the PR #3751 should just fix the issue FLINK-6330.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user mtunique commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3428
@thvasilo After #3756 is merged, I will change this PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user mtunique commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3756
Split from #3428.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
GitHub user mtunique opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3756
[FLINK-2013] Create generalized linear model framework
Thanks for contributing to Apache Flink. Before you open your pull request,
please take the following check list into consideration.
If
Github user mtunique commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3428
Thanks all for the comments.
The code from Spark has be labeled like some other codes from Spark.
I will spilt this PR into two PRs. The other one is for FLINK-2013.
---
If your project is
Github user mtunique commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3428
@thvasilo
- Add `MultipleLinearRegression ` to provide interfaces for the set of
common properties and functions generalized linear models share.
- Change `LogisticLoss` to let it be with
Github user mtunique commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3719
I will follow the branch.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
GitHub user mtunique opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3720
[FLINK-6302] Documentation build error on ruby 2.4
Thanks for contributing to Apache Flink. Before you open your pull request,
please take the following check list into consideration.
If your
GitHub user mtunique opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3719
[FLINK-6303] Documentation support build in docker on OSX
Thanks for contributing to Apache Flink. Before you open your pull request,
please take the following check list into consideration
GitHub user mtunique opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3718
[FLINK-6112] Support Calcite 1.12's new numerical functions
Thanks for contributing to Apache Flink. Before you open your pull request,
please take the following check list into consider
Github user mtunique commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3565
@KurtYoung I sorry about it, I will change it. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
GitHub user mtunique opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3565
[FLINK-5413] [table] Convert TableEnvironmentITCases to unit tests
Thanks for contributing to Apache Flink. Before you open your pull request,
please take the following check list into
Github user mtunique closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3463
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user mtunique opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3463
[FLINK-5952] JobCancellationWithSavepointHandlersTest uses deprecated
JsonNode#getValuesAsText
Thanks for contributing to Apache Flink. Before you open your pull request,
please take the
GitHub user mtunique opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3428
[FLINK-1743] Add multinomial logistic regression to machine learning library
Thanks for contributing to Apache Flink. Before you open your pull request,
please take the following check list into
Github user mtunique commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1985
Could this PR be merged ? Maybe this PR blocks to design
GLM([FLINK-2013](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2013)).
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user mtunique commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3087
Maybe we should open an issue about `Checkpointed` java doc to talk about
how to replace the APIs.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
GitHub user mtunique opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3099
[FLINK-5268] Split TableProgramsTestBase into
TableProgramsCollectionTestBase and TableProgramsClusterTestBase
â¦TestBase and TableProgramsClusterTestBase
Thanks for contributing to
GitHub user mtunique opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3098
[FLINK-5438] Typo in JobGraph generator Exception
Thanks for contributing to Apache Flink. Before you open your pull request,
please take the following check list into consideration.
If your
GitHub user mtunique opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3097
[FLINK-5448] Fix typo in StateAssignmentOperation Exception
Thanks for contributing to Apache Flink. Before you open your pull request,
please take the following check list into consideration
Github user mtunique commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3087
@greghogan I have add the javadoc about replacement. Maybe `Checkpointed`
has the same problem about javadoc. Fix it in this PR or create a new issue on
jira?
---
If your project is set up for it
Github user mtunique commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3087
I am sorry about it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
GitHub user mtunique opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3087
[FLINK-4917] Deprecate "CheckpointedAsynchronously" interface
- [x] General
- The pull request references the related JIRA issue ([FLINK-4917]
Deprecate "Checkpointe
Github user mtunique commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2977
@fhueske Done. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user mtunique commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2977
@fhueske I have finished all about comments and rebase.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user mtunique closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3041
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user mtunique opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3041
Flink 5084 tmp
Thanks for contributing to Apache Flink. Before you open your pull request,
please take the following check list into consideration.
If your changes take all of the items into
Github user mtunique commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2977
Hi @fhueske ,
I have fixed the comments.
Maybe you can review the changes, then I rebase the master branch and
refactor the directory structure.Maybe this can be easy to review by two
Github user mtunique commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2977
@fhueske
I have finish there tasks:
- remove `./test/java/org/apache/flink/api/java/batch/ExplainTest`
- All tests in `test/java/org/apache/flink/api/java/batch/table` are
implemented
Github user mtunique commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2977
Thanks @fhueske .
I agree very much.
It is necessary to split the tests into a validation and a plan test class.
I will follow the suggestions.
---
If your project is set up for it, you
GitHub user mtunique opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2977
Flink 5084
I replace the Java Table API ITCases by tests that check that the parsing
step produces a valid logical plan.
Before I delete the ITCases, I have check there are UTCases in scala
36 matches
Mail list logo
