Github user kbialek commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/commit/13bb32ef891428fe9e0e14b6ecc525f15c52c40a#commitcomment-27763936
This change broke my flink-consul implementation. That is not a big deal,
however I wonder if it wouldn't break ZK recover
Github user kbialek commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/5530
Looks like build process was terminated by kernel. Can someone retrigger it?
---
Github user kbialek commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/5530
Now uses high-availability configuration property can be set either to
none, zookeeper or FQN of factory class
---
GitHub user kbialek reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/5530
[FLINK-8660] Enable the user to provide custom HAServices implementation
## What is the purpose of the change
This pull request makes it possible to use alternative (to ZK) HA backend
Github user kbialek closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/5530
---
Github user kbialek commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/5530
Closing without merge, because of:
1. Test failure
2. I'd like to implement Stephan's idea
---
GitHub user kbialek opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/5530
[FLINK-8660] Enable the user to provide custom HAServices implementation
## What is the purpose of the change
This pull request makes it possible to use alternative (to ZK) HA backend
