Github user FelixNeutatz closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/308
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user FelixNeutatz closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/833
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user FelixNeutatz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/833#issuecomment-119519615
thanks, so I will close it
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user FelixNeutatz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/833#issuecomment-119234837
I have no time at the moment to think about it. But this is still an issue
...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
GitHub user FelixNeutatz opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/833
[FLINK-2208] Fix IBM Java integration bug
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/FelixNeutatz/incubator-flink
FLINK_2208_IBM_JAVA
Github user FelixNeutatz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/308#issuecomment-101981739
So, what is the final decision here?
> this seems like a lot of code for something that can be achieved using a
simple mapper
--> that is exact
Github user FelixNeutatz closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/661
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user FelixNeutatz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/661#issuecomment-100690583
This will be further implemented here:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/665
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user FelixNeutatz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/665#discussion_r30005430
--- Diff:
flink-staging/flink-ml/src/main/scala/org/apache/flink/ml/feature/extraction/FeatureHasher.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,142
GitHub user FelixNeutatz opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/661
Feature hasher
First version of the feature hasher :)
This is joined work by:
- Christoph Alt
- Xi Yang
- Felix Neutatz
You can merge this pull request into a Git
Github user FelixNeutatz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/566#discussion_r29148302
--- Diff:
flink-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/types/parser/IntParser.java ---
@@ -38,19 +38,28 @@ public int parseField(byte[] bytes, int startPos
Github user FelixNeutatz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/566#discussion_r29145755
--- Diff:
flink-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/types/parser/IntParser.java ---
@@ -38,19 +38,28 @@ public int parseField(byte[] bytes, int startPos
Github user FelixNeutatz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/566#issuecomment-94810290
@fhueske: I agree on that :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user FelixNeutatz closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/608
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
GitHub user FelixNeutatz opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/608
[FLINK-1900] add missing '
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/FelixNeutatz/incubator-flink patch-1
Alternatively yo
GitHub user FelixNeutatz opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/566
[FLINK-1820] Interpret empty string as zero
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/FelixNeutatz/incubator-flink ParserBug
GitHub user FelixNeutatz opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/340
[FLINK-1428] Update dataset_transformations.md
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/FelixNeutatz/incubator-flink
FelixNeutatz
Github user FelixNeutatz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/308#issuecomment-69966273
I am really open about the place of this functionality, but I'd really love
to have it. Shall we start a package in flink-java?
---
If your project is set u
Github user FelixNeutatz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/308#issuecomment-69962411
The simple map function implementation reduces the code to 26 lines. I
think that this is more reasonable :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user FelixNeutatz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/308#issuecomment-69952101
Good question, I thought it would be nice to have it implemented
"natively", but I can also setup the same thing using a simple map function if
this is
GitHub user FelixNeutatz opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/308
[FLINK-1398] Introduce extractSingleField() in DataSet
This is a prototype how we could implement extractSingleField() for
DataSet. Let's discuss :)
You can merge this pull request into
Github user FelixNeutatz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/287#issuecomment-69513699
I rebased some of the commits as requested
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user FelixNeutatz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/287#issuecomment-69222057
Shall also add the same test for the mapred package?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user FelixNeutatz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/287#issuecomment-69220758
I added a simple unit test: HadoopInputFormatTest.java
Did you mean this test?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
24 matches
Mail list logo
