[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15758235#comment-15758235
]
Eron Wright commented on FLINK-2821:
-
Folks, would there be any issue with canonicali
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5258?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15757856#comment-15757856
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-5258:
---
Github user mindprince commented on the iss
Github user mindprince commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2940
We seem to have lost changes from
https://github.com/apache/flink/commit/c024b0b6cae16a0b668d864c77e923820c262087
and
https://github.com/apache/flink/commit/91414d9611a5a14d4d73ae5ea090c16406dcf0
Github user EronWright commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2864
@mxm I think the root cause was incorrectly diagnosed here, and as a result
this PR did the wrong thing. It is incorrect to bypass the UGI login methods
when in 'SIMPLE' auth mode.
For
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5055?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15757752#comment-15757752
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-5055:
---
Github user EronWright commented on the iss
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15757573#comment-15757573
]
Eron Wright edited comment on FLINK-5350 at 12/17/16 9:49 PM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Eron Wright reopened FLINK-5350:
-
I think we need to revisit how to accomplish this.
> Don't overwrite existing Jaas config property
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15757568#comment-15757568
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-5350:
---
Github user EronWright commented on the iss
Github user EronWright commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3017
@mxm please consider adding me as a reviewer for changes to the security
subsystem in the near term.I believe this PR introduces a regression where
it fails to install a Hadoop security contex