[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1085?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14597014#comment-14597014
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-1085:
---
Github user dabaitu commented on the pull r
Github user dabaitu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/854#issuecomment-114331577
@StephanEwen @fhueske - apologies, I forgot to call collect.
A dumb question - why do we need to sort the records before combining them?
Should I just call collect on
Greg Hogan created FLINK-2262:
-
Summary: ParameterTool API misnamed function
Key: FLINK-2262
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2262
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Bug
Compone
Github user gyfora commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/802#issuecomment-114252224
Reduce fold and aggregations are being removed from non-grouped DataStream,
so we might want to remove that commit.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2180?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14596585#comment-14596585
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2180:
---
Github user gyfora commented on the pull re
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14596576#comment-14596576
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2255:
---
Github user gyfora commented on the pull re
Github user gyfora commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/857#issuecomment-114250566
Looks good :+1:
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user gyfora opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/860
[FLINK-2261] [streaming] Remove reduce/fold/aggregations from DataStream
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/gyfora/flink FLINK-2261
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2261?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14596574#comment-14596574
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2261:
---
GitHub user gyfora opened a pull request:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14596535#comment-14596535
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2194:
---
Github user tillrohrmann commented on the p
Github user tillrohrmann commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/814#issuecomment-114236910
Moreover, it would be inconsistent IMO with the rest of the typing system.
Sometimes interfaces are supported and sometimes not. For the user, this might
be confusin
Github user tillrohrmann commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/814#issuecomment-114232368
The subtypes of `Writable` are still serialized using the special
`Writable` serializer. However, there are situations where you only have a
`Writable` type, e.g. fo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14596523#comment-14596523
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2194:
---
Github user tillrohrmann commented on the p
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1319?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ufuk Celebi resolved FLINK-1319.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 0.10
0.9
Fixed via c854d5260c20b0926c4347
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-536?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ufuk Celebi resolved FLINK-536.
---
Resolution: Fixed
> Integrate Static Code Analysis
> --
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1319?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14596447#comment-14596447
]
Ufuk Celebi commented on FLINK-1319:
Yes, JIRA was down the day I merged the PR. Will
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14596436#comment-14596436
]
Aljoscha Krettek commented on FLINK-2236:
-
Yes, in the release the RowSerializer i
Github user thvasilo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/710#issuecomment-114211636
On that front, do you think it's possible to split the online histogram and
the decision tree code into two PRs that we can review separately?
If the online hist
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14596391#comment-14596391
]
Theodore Vasiloudis commented on FLINK-2245:
Yup for me the important thing is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1319?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14596381#comment-14596381
]
Robert Metzger commented on FLINK-1319:
---
I guess we can close this issue? (and FLINK
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2244?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14596378#comment-14596378
]
Theodore Vasiloudis commented on FLINK-2244:
It would work differently for eac
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1541?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Metzger updated FLINK-1541:
--
Assignee: (was: Robert Metzger)
> GSoC project: Distributed profiling
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2186?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14596366#comment-14596366
]
Theodore Vasiloudis commented on FLINK-2186:
That's correct, readTextFile is p
Gyula Fora created FLINK-2261:
-
Summary: Remove reduce/aggregation from DataStream
Key: FLINK-2261
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2261
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Improvement
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/750#issuecomment-114188551
I disagree with the execution graph changes. I took us 6 months to get it
stable, and we still discover corner cases. The new state interacts with all
other states. U
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2111?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14596266#comment-14596266
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2111:
---
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pu
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/856#issuecomment-114184385
Here seems to be something with quite some broader implications. This
affects the design of aggregations on windows and how they can be
pre-aggregated.
The w
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2143?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14596254#comment-14596254
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2143:
---
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14596253#comment-14596253
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2255:
---
Github user mbalassi commented on the pull
Github user mbalassi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/857#issuecomment-114184152
Thanks for spotting this, Gabor. Looks good to merge.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user senorcarbone commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/747#issuecomment-114180337
We have added a `KeyedDataStream` type to the API as you can see in the
last commit. It is basically a supertype of `GroupDataStream` and represents a
`DataStream` w
Github user mbalassi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/855#issuecomment-114179961
Merging.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14596228#comment-14596228
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2235:
---
Github user uce commented on a diff in the
Github user uce commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/859#discussion_r32957111
--- Diff:
flink-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/util/EnvironmentInformation.java
---
@@ -137,7 +137,13 @@ public static long getSizeOfFreeHeapMemor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2119?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14596209#comment-14596209
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2119:
---
Github user uce commented on the pull reque
Github user uce commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/754#issuecomment-114176855
Addressed @tillrohrmann's comments and rebased on master. @tillrohrmann,
should we merge with your upcoming changes or can we merge it before?
---
If your project is set up
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/855#issuecomment-114177459
Looks good, +1 to merge
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14596210#comment-14596210
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-297:
--
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pull
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/677#issuecomment-114176858
I think it will. I will try and add further code for the new webfrontend in
the next days, and then open a new pull request that subsumes this one and #297
---
If yo
Github user sachingoel0101 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/710#issuecomment-114173765
The fundamental idea for a scalable decision tree algorithm is to reduce
the number of splits required to be checked at every node. Ideally, we'd check
for every v
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14596188#comment-14596188
]
Stephan Ewen commented on FLINK-2245:
-
Ah, sorry, confusion: You were talking about th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14596187#comment-14596187
]
Stephan Ewen commented on FLINK-2245:
-
I would actually assume that programs with mult
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2204?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ufuk Celebi resolved FLINK-2204.
Resolution: Fixed
> Tez ConnectedComponentsStepITCase fails spuriously on Travis
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2175?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14596127#comment-14596127
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2175:
---
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pu
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/707#issuecomment-114165604
+1 for adding this, looks good!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does n
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2186?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14596116#comment-14596116
]
Stephan Ewen commented on FLINK-2186:
-
Not sure if we can/want to fix this on the gene
GitHub user mxm opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/859
[FLINK-2235] fix calculation of free memory for local execution
The Java runtime may return Long.MAX_VALUE for a call to the maxMemory()
method of the Runtime class. In these cases, we simply use the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14596111#comment-14596111
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2235:
---
GitHub user mxm opened a pull request:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2244?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14596107#comment-14596107
]
Stephan Ewen commented on FLINK-2244:
-
This is a very generic/broad feature.
This woul
Github user hsaputra commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/747#discussion_r32949021
--- Diff:
flink-staging/flink-streaming/flink-streaming-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/streaming/api/state/PartitionedStreamOperatorState.java
---
@@ -0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14596102#comment-14596102
]
Stephan Ewen commented on FLINK-2235:
-
Sounds like a good way to fix this...
> Local
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14596100#comment-14596100
]
Stephan Ewen commented on FLINK-2236:
-
I think this is fixed in the release, correct?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14596099#comment-14596099
]
Maximilian Michels commented on FLINK-2235:
---
Actually, I think the explanation i
Github user thvasilo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/710#issuecomment-114154438
Helo @sachingoel0101, I've started reviewing this PR. It would help a lot
if you check out these initial comments I made and try to fix similar issues
throughout the PR.
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/811
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1727?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14596087#comment-14596087
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-1727:
---
Github user thvasilo commented on the pull
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2230?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14596084#comment-14596084
]
Stephan Ewen commented on FLINK-2230:
-
There have been many discussions about whether
Github user mxm commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/811#issuecomment-114153093
Thanks, merging then.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this featu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14596071#comment-14596071
]
Stephan Ewen commented on FLINK-2231:
-
Exactly, the createTypeInformation macro needs
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2209?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14596068#comment-14596068
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2209:
---
Github user mbalassi commented on the pull
Github user mbalassi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/835#issuecomment-114149626
I do not think that we can expect that every user starts from the
quickstart poms, but it is true that a reference to that would have been nicer.
I have to admi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2108?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14596056#comment-14596056
]
Theodore Vasiloudis commented on FLINK-2108:
Hello Sachin, could you give us a
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/835#issuecomment-114143834
I am a bit confused here. With the quickstart maven projects, fat jar
building works without configuring, as it defines proper assembly and share
configurations for f
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2209?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14596054#comment-14596054
]
Stephan Ewen commented on FLINK-2209:
-
Reopened this, because I think this documentati
Github user thvasilo commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/710#discussion_r32944486
--- Diff:
flink-staging/flink-ml/src/main/scala/org/apache/flink/ml/classification/DecisionTree.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,490 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the A
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2209?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stephan Ewen reopened FLINK-2209:
-
Assignee: (was: Márton Balassi)
> Document how to use TableAPI, Gelly and FlinkML, Streaming
Github user thvasilo commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/710#discussion_r32944538
--- Diff:
flink-staging/flink-ml/src/main/scala/org/apache/flink/ml/classification/DecisionTree.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,490 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the A
Github user thvasilo commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/710#discussion_r32944309
--- Diff:
flink-staging/flink-ml/src/main/scala/org/apache/flink/ml/classification/DecisionTree.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,490 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the A
Github user thvasilo commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/710#discussion_r32944368
--- Diff:
flink-staging/flink-ml/src/main/scala/org/apache/flink/ml/classification/DecisionTree.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,490 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the A
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2209?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14596043#comment-14596043
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2209:
---
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pu
Github user thvasilo commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/710#discussion_r32943140
--- Diff:
flink-staging/flink-ml/src/main/scala/org/apache/flink/ml/tree/Tree.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,327 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foun
Github user thvasilo commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/710#discussion_r32942958
--- Diff:
flink-staging/flink-ml/src/main/scala/org/apache/flink/ml/tree/Tree.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,327 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foun
Github user thvasilo commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/710#discussion_r32941583
--- Diff:
flink-staging/flink-ml/src/main/scala/org/apache/flink/ml/classification/DecisionTree.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,490 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the A
Github user thvasilo commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/710#discussion_r32942116
--- Diff:
flink-staging/flink-ml/src/main/scala/org/apache/flink/ml/classification/DecisionTree.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,490 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the A
Github user thvasilo commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/710#discussion_r32941921
--- Diff:
flink-staging/flink-ml/src/main/scala/org/apache/flink/ml/classification/DecisionTree.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,490 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the A
Github user thvasilo commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/710#discussion_r32941719
--- Diff:
flink-staging/flink-ml/src/main/scala/org/apache/flink/ml/classification/DecisionTree.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,490 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the A
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2157?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Theodore Vasiloudis updated FLINK-2157:
---
Fix Version/s: 0.10
> Create evaluation framework for ML library
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Theodore Vasiloudis updated FLINK-2260:
---
Description: This is an umbrella ticket to keep track on the work on the
model evaluat
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1731?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14595995#comment-14595995
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-1731:
---
Github user thvasilo commented on the pull
Github user thvasilo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/700#issuecomment-114135260
Hello @peedeeX21 , most of the failing Travis tests have been fixed in the
current master, could you try rebasing this PR and making a forced push to this
branch?
---
Github user thvasilo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/823#issuecomment-114134005
Hello @shakir774 , as @sachingoel0101 mentioned you must rebase your
current implementation on the current master as the underlying code for FlinkML
has changed consider
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1732?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14595992#comment-14595992
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-1732:
---
Github user thvasilo commented on the pull
Github user thvasilo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/801#issuecomment-114132214
Hello, wondering what the status is on this PR
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2150?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14595989#comment-14595989
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2150:
---
Github user thvasilo commented on the pull
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2097?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14595987#comment-14595987
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2097:
---
GitHub user mxm opened a pull request:
GitHub user mxm opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/858
[FLINK-2097] Implement job session management
This is a joint effort by @StephanEwen and me to introduce a session
management in Flink. Session are used to keep a copy of the ExecutionGraph in
the job m
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Maximilian Michels updated FLINK-2251:
--
Issue Type: New Feature (was: Sub-task)
Parent: (was: FLINK-2250)
> Impleme
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2097?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Maximilian Michels updated FLINK-2097:
--
Issue Type: Sub-task (was: New Feature)
Parent: FLINK-2250
> Add support for Jo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Maximilian Michels closed FLINK-2251.
-
Resolution: Duplicate
> Implement job session management
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2111?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14595969#comment-14595969
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2111:
---
Github user mjsax commented on the pull req
Github user mjsax commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/750#issuecomment-114123970
I agree that extending the state graph is critical. However, IMHO it is the
right way to go. I would rather spend more time on getting it right in the
first place, than int
Theodore Vasiloudis created FLINK-2260:
--
Summary: Have a complete model evaluation and selection framework
for FlinkML
Key: FLINK-2260
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2260
Projec
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2116?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14595956#comment-14595956
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2116:
---
Github user thvasilo commented on the pull
Github user thvasilo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/772#issuecomment-114117337
OK so as I understand it this PR is about splitting the prediction with
Vector and LabeledVector input into two functions instead of one as it is now.
This allow
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/750#issuecomment-114109425
I had a look at your code. A lot of it looks good.
The one thing I would really like to change is the modification of the
execution graph state machine. That
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2111?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14595933#comment-14595933
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2111:
---
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2157?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mikio Braun reassigned FLINK-2157:
--
Assignee: Mikio Braun
> Create evaluation framework for ML library
> --
Theodore Vasiloudis created FLINK-2259:
--
Summary: Support training Estimators using a (train, validation,
test) split of the available data
Key: FLINK-2259
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-225
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2157?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mikio Braun reassigned FLINK-2157:
--
Assignee: (was: Mikio Braun)
> Create evaluation framework for ML library
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2204?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14595910#comment-14595910
]
Stephan Ewen commented on FLINK-2204:
-
Hmm, looks again like a Tez issue.
No Flink c
1 - 100 of 189 matches
Mail list logo
