[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-1693) Deprecate the Spargel API

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14512882#comment-14512882 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-1693: --- Github user hsaputra commented on the pull

[GitHub] flink pull request: FLINK-1693 Add DEPRECATED annotations in Sparg...

Github user hsaputra commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/618#issuecomment-96323780 Thanks @vasia, will merge this end of day tomorrow --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your

[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-1758) Extend Gelly's neighborhood methods

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1758?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14512677#comment-14512677 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-1758: --- Github user vasia commented on the pull req

[GitHub] flink pull request: [FLINK-1758][gelly] Neighborhood Methods Exten...

Github user vasia commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/576#issuecomment-96271897 Hey @andralungu! I see your point regarding `iterateOn...` and `reduce...`. Let's leave it like this for now. Only small thing that maybe I didn't explain well, is "o

[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-1670) Collect method for streaming

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14512547#comment-14512547 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-1670: --- Github user ggevay commented on the pull re

[GitHub] flink pull request: [FLINK-1670] Made DataStream iterable

Github user ggevay commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/581#issuecomment-96220876 I made the modification to use NetUtils.findConnectingAddress. I tested it in both local and remote environments. I also tested the scenario that you mentioned where I laun

[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-1908) JobManager startup delay isn't considered when using start-cluster.sh script

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1908?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14512469#comment-14512469 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-1908: --- Github user DarkKnightCZ commented on the p

[GitHub] flink pull request: [FLINK-1908] JobManager startup delay isn't co...

Github user DarkKnightCZ commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/609#issuecomment-96182670 @StephanEwen: Hi, yes, you're correct. In 0.9 it works as it should (i.e. tries connecting to JM several times) So i guess this PR can be closed --- If your

[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-1918) NullPointerException at org.apache.flink.client.program.Client's constructor while using ExecutionEnvironment.createRemoteEnvironment

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1918?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14512380#comment-14512380 ] Zoltán Zvara commented on FLINK-1918: - Thanks, it really was a failed lookup. > NullP