jfclere commented on PR #265:
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-daemon/pull/265#issuecomment-3095926869
OK I am on it ;-)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment
markt-asf commented on PR #265:
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-daemon/pull/265#issuecomment-3095919403
OK. I'm less concerned then. That said, that suggests the CI build isn't
building the binary correctly. I'd suggest fixing that rather than adding the
dll so potential issues are n
jfclere commented on PR #265:
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-daemon/pull/265#issuecomment-3095783555
It is a from a CI output.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
markt-asf commented on PR #265:
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-daemon/pull/265#issuecomment-3095753452
Sorry. Let me step back a bit. Is this binary from a release (if so which
one) or a CI output?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the mess
jfclere commented on PR #265:
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-daemon/pull/265#issuecomment-3095734338
From the artifact.
Note https://github.com/apache/commons-daemon/pull/271 that makes a static
binary.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to
markt-asf commented on PR #265:
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-daemon/pull/265#issuecomment-3095723633
Where did you get the binary from?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to t
jfclere commented on PR #265:
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-daemon/pull/265#issuecomment-3095647489
I tested on a clean 2025 server install, copy the executable and noted that
it needs vcruntime140.dll.
Having the executable available makes testing on different OS version more
markt-asf commented on PR #265:
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-daemon/pull/265#issuecomment-3090022303
-1 (almost veto). This absolutely should not be necessary. If it is, the
binary hasn't been built properly. Which binary were you testing with? I
thought I'd tested the most recent
jfclere commented on PR #265:
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-daemon/pull/265#issuecomment-3089863140
the artifact needs vcruntime140.dll
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to th
jfclere merged PR #265:
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-daemon/pull/265
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@common
jfclere opened a new pull request, #265:
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-daemon/pull/265
Thanks for your contribution to [Apache
Commons](https://commons.apache.org/)! Your help is appreciated!
Before you push a pull request, review this list:
- [ ] Read the [con
11 matches
Mail list logo
