[jira] [Assigned] (CLOUDSTACK-6448) VPC router won't be created when a private gateway is defined.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Saksham Srivastava reassigned CLOUDSTACK-6448: -- Assignee: (was: Saksham Srivastava) > VPC router won't be crea

[jira] [Assigned] (CLOUDSTACK-6812) For storage type which does not support over provisioning ,over provisioning factor should be 1

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6812?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Saksham Srivastava reassigned CLOUDSTACK-6812: -- Assignee: (was: Saksham Srivastava) > For storage type which d

[jira] [Assigned] (CLOUDSTACK-4622) [IP Reservation][If a VM from guest network is added to network tier of VPC then IP reservation allows the CIDR to be a superset of Network CIDR for that VPC tier

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4622?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Saksham Srivastava reassigned CLOUDSTACK-4622: -- Assignee: (was: Saksham Srivastava) > [IP Reservation][If a VM

[jira] [Assigned] (CLOUDSTACK-3029) Add improved and specific logs,exceptions for Dedicated Resources.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3029?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Saksham Srivastava reassigned CLOUDSTACK-3029: -- Assignee: (was: Saksham Srivastava) > Add improved and specifi

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-3925) Allow Root Admin to deploy VMs on Zone dedicated to any domain/account.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3925?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13736641#comment-13736641 ] Saksham Srivastava commented on CLOUDSTACK-3925: Currently the root a

[jira] [Closed] (CLOUDSTACK-3925) Allow Root Admin to deploy VMs on Zone dedicated to any domain/account.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3925?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Saksham Srivastava closed CLOUDSTACK-3925. -- > Allow Root Admin to deploy VMs on Zone dedicated to any domain/account.

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-3925) Allow Root Admin to deploy VMs on Zone dedicated to any domain/account.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3925?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Saksham Srivastava updated CLOUDSTACK-3925: --- Status: Open (was: Ready To Review) > Allow Root Admin to deploy VM

[jira] [Resolved] (CLOUDSTACK-3925) Allow Root Admin to deploy VMs on Zone dedicated to any domain/account.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3925?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Saksham Srivastava resolved CLOUDSTACK-3925. Resolution: Not A Problem > Allow Root Admin to deploy VMs on Zone

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-4189) [UI] In multi zone setup, dedicating a single zone to a domain, shows other zones dedicated as well

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4189?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Saksham Srivastava updated CLOUDSTACK-4189: --- Status: Ready To Review (was: In Progress) > [UI] In multi zone set

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-4189) [UI] In multi zone setup, dedicating a single zone to a domain, shows other zones dedicated as well

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4189?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13736810#comment-13736810 ] Saksham Srivastava commented on CLOUDSTACK-4189: Fix available at : h

[jira] [Resolved] (CLOUDSTACK-4189) [UI] In multi zone setup, dedicating a single zone to a domain, shows other zones dedicated as well

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4189?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Saksham Srivastava resolved CLOUDSTACK-4189. Resolution: Fixed > [UI] In multi zone setup, dedicating a single

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-4021) [Automation] TestExplicitDedication.test_01_deploy_vm_with_explicit_dedication failed to deploy VM

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4021?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13738129#comment-13738129 ] Saksham Srivastava commented on CLOUDSTACK-4021: There are new change

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-3730) physical_size column in template_store_ref shows value as 0 when a template is created from a snapshot

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3730?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Saksham Srivastava updated CLOUDSTACK-3730: --- Priority: Critical (was: Major) > physical_size column in template_

[jira] [Closed] (CLOUDSTACK-4189) [UI] In multi zone setup, dedicating a single zone to a domain, shows other zones dedicated as well

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4189?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Saksham Srivastava closed CLOUDSTACK-4189. -- Assignee: (was: Saksham Srivastava) > [UI] In multi zone setup, de

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-4189) [UI] In multi zone setup, dedicating a single zone to a domain, shows other zones dedicated as well

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4189?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13743618#comment-13743618 ] Saksham Srivastava commented on CLOUDSTACK-4189: The issue is resolve

[jira] [Assigned] (CLOUDSTACK-4257) [Automation] test_storage_motion test cases failed during with unexpected result in listStoragePool API call

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Saksham Srivastava reassigned CLOUDSTACK-4257: -- Assignee: Saksham Srivastava > [Automation] test_storage_motio

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-4257) [Automation] test_storage_motion test cases failed during with unexpected result in listStoragePool API call

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Saksham Srivastava updated CLOUDSTACK-4257: --- Status: Ready To Review (was: In Progress) > [Automation] test_stor

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-4257) [Automation] test_storage_motion test cases failed during with unexpected result in listStoragePool API call

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13743727#comment-13743727 ] Saksham Srivastava commented on CLOUDSTACK-4257: Fix available at : h

[jira] [Closed] (CLOUDSTACK-3476) deleteDomain api should fail when release dedicated resource to that domain fails

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3476?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Saksham Srivastava closed CLOUDSTACK-3476. -- > deleteDomain api should fail when release dedicated resource to that dom

[jira] [Closed] (CLOUDSTACK-4104) VM Creation should fail if a zone is dedicated to a domain and user of the same domain deploys vm without using affinity group "Explicit Dedication"

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4104?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Saksham Srivastava closed CLOUDSTACK-4104. -- > VM Creation should fail if a zone is dedicated to a domain and user of t

[jira] [Resolved] (CLOUDSTACK-4257) [Automation] test_storage_motion test cases failed during with unexpected result in listStoragePool API call

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Saksham Srivastava resolved CLOUDSTACK-4257. Resolution: Fixed > [Automation] test_storage_motion test cases fa

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-4021) [Automation] TestExplicitDedication.test_01_deploy_vm_with_explicit_dedication failed to deploy VM

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4021?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13747410#comment-13747410 ] Saksham Srivastava commented on CLOUDSTACK-4021: There is a review re

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-3925) Allow Root Admin to deploy VMs on Infrastructure dedicated to any domain/account.

Saksham Srivastava created CLOUDSTACK-3925: -- Summary: Allow Root Admin to deploy VMs on Infrastructure dedicated to any domain/account. Key: CLOUDSTACK-3925 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOU

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-3252) An instance deployed using explicit or implicit dedication doesn't generate a usage event

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3252?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13723811#comment-13723811 ] Saksham Srivastava commented on CLOUDSTACK-3252: Fix available for re

[jira] [Assigned] (CLOUDSTACK-3730) physical_size column in template_store_ref shows value as 0 when a template is created from a snapshot

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3730?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Saksham Srivastava reassigned CLOUDSTACK-3730: -- Assignee: (was: Saksham Srivastava) > physical_size column

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-3925) Allow Root Admin to deploy VMs on Zone dedicated to any domain/account.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3925?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Saksham Srivastava updated CLOUDSTACK-3925: --- Summary: Allow Root Admin to deploy VMs on Zone dedicated to any domain/

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-3925) Allow Root Admin to deploy VMs on Zone dedicated to any domain/account.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3925?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Saksham Srivastava updated CLOUDSTACK-3925: --- Priority: Critical (was: Major) > Allow Root Admin to deploy VMs on

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-3925) Allow Root Admin to deploy VMs on Zone dedicated to any domain/account.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3925?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Saksham Srivastava updated CLOUDSTACK-3925: --- Status: Ready To Review (was: In Progress) > Allow Root Admin to de

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-3925) Allow Root Admin to deploy VMs on Zone dedicated to any domain/account.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3925?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13729413#comment-13729413 ] Saksham Srivastava commented on CLOUDSTACK-3925: Available for review

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-4104) VM Creation should fail if a zone is dedicated to a domain and user of the same domain deploys vm without using affinity group "Explicit Dedication"

Saksham Srivastava created CLOUDSTACK-4104: -- Summary: VM Creation should fail if a zone is dedicated to a domain and user of the same domain deploys vm without using affinity group "Explicit Dedication" Key: CLOUDSTACK-4

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-4104) VM Creation should fail if a zone is dedicated to a domain and user of the same domain deploys vm without using affinity group "Explicit Dedication"

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4104?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Saksham Srivastava updated CLOUDSTACK-4104: --- Status: Ready To Review (was: In Progress) > VM Creation should fai

[jira] [Resolved] (CLOUDSTACK-4104) VM Creation should fail if a zone is dedicated to a domain and user of the same domain deploys vm without using affinity group "Explicit Dedication"

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4104?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Saksham Srivastava resolved CLOUDSTACK-4104. Resolution: Fixed > VM Creation should fail if a zone is dedicated

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-4021) [Automation] TestExplicitDedication.test_01_deploy_vm_with_explicit_dedication failed to deploy VM

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4021?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13732003#comment-13732003 ] Saksham Srivastava commented on CLOUDSTACK-4021: The issue is only re

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-4021) [Automation] TestExplicitDedication.test_01_deploy_vm_with_explicit_dedication failed to deploy VM

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4021?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13732131#comment-13732131 ] Saksham Srivastava commented on CLOUDSTACK-4021: Fix available for re

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-4021) [Automation] TestExplicitDedication.test_01_deploy_vm_with_explicit_dedication failed to deploy VM

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4021?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Saksham Srivastava updated CLOUDSTACK-4021: --- Status: Ready To Review (was: In Progress) > [Automation] > TestEx

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-4189) [UI] In multi zone setup, dedicating a single zone to a domain, shows other zones dedicated as well

Saksham Srivastava created CLOUDSTACK-4189: -- Summary: [UI] In multi zone setup, dedicating a single zone to a domain, shows other zones dedicated as well Key: CLOUDSTACK-4189 URL: https://issues.apache.or

[jira] [Resolved] (CLOUDSTACK-4021) [Automation] TestExplicitDedication.test_01_deploy_vm_with_explicit_dedication failed to deploy VM

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4021?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Saksham Srivastava resolved CLOUDSTACK-4021. Resolution: Fixed > [Automation] > TestExplicitDedication.test_01

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-3067) UI for Dedicating POD/Cluster/Host is misleading Icons should be changed.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3067?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Saksham Srivastava updated CLOUDSTACK-3067: --- Priority: Critical (was: Minor) > UI for Dedicating POD/Cluster/Hos

[jira] [Reopened] (CLOUDSTACK-3382) Unable to Migrate VM's If the hosts are implicitly or explicitly dedicated.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3382?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Saksham Srivastava reopened CLOUDSTACK-3382: Migration of VM can only be done root admin. Since a root admin controls t

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-3625) Non CloudStack VM's = Alien VM's are deleted

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3625?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13712107#comment-13712107 ] Saksham Srivastava commented on CLOUDSTACK-3625: One way to have your

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-3625) Non CloudStack VM's = Alien VM's are deleted

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3625?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13712111#comment-13712111 ] Saksham Srivastava commented on CLOUDSTACK-3625: If you are trying to

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-3382) Unable to Migrate VM's If the hosts are implicitly or explicitly dedicated.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3382?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13712223#comment-13712223 ] Saksham Srivastava commented on CLOUDSTACK-3382: Available for review

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-3188) Not able to add network to a VM after installing the Vmtools on a windows VM.(regression)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13712265#comment-13712265 ] Saksham Srivastava commented on CLOUDSTACK-3188: Should be fixed by

[jira] [Resolved] (CLOUDSTACK-3188) Not able to add network to a VM after installing the Vmtools on a windows VM.(regression)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Saksham Srivastava resolved CLOUDSTACK-3188. Resolution: Fixed > Not able to add network to a VM after installi

[jira] [Resolved] (CLOUDSTACK-3476) deleteDomain api should fail when release dedicated resource to that domain fails

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3476?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Saksham Srivastava resolved CLOUDSTACK-3476. Resolution: Fixed > deleteDomain api should fail when release dedi

[jira] [Assigned] (CLOUDSTACK-3555) [VMWARE]Newly registered Templates size is set to zero after download is complete

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3555?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Saksham Srivastava reassigned CLOUDSTACK-3555: -- Assignee: Saksham Srivastava > [VMWARE]Newly registered Templa

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-3686) Registering a template does not generate a usage event.

Saksham Srivastava created CLOUDSTACK-3686: -- Summary: Registering a template does not generate a usage event. Key: CLOUDSTACK-3686 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3686 Pr

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-3686) Registering a template does not generate a usage event.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3686?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Saksham Srivastava updated CLOUDSTACK-3686: --- Description: The event of registering template is present in event table

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-3730) physical_size column in template_store_ref shows value as 0 when a template is created from a snapshot

Saksham Srivastava created CLOUDSTACK-3730: -- Summary: physical_size column in template_store_ref shows value as 0 when a template is created from a snapshot Key: CLOUDSTACK-3730 URL: https://issues.apache

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-2508) Template usage should report both physical and virtual sizes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2508?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Saksham Srivastava updated CLOUDSTACK-2508: --- Status: Ready To Review (was: In Progress) > Template usage should

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-2508) Template usage should report both physical and virtual sizes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2508?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13716321#comment-13716321 ] Saksham Srivastava commented on CLOUDSTACK-2508: Available for review

[jira] [Resolved] (CLOUDSTACK-3382) Unable to Migrate VM's If the hosts are implicitly or explicitly dedicated.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3382?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Saksham Srivastava resolved CLOUDSTACK-3382. Resolution: Fixed > Unable to Migrate VM's If the hosts are implic

[jira] [Assigned] (CLOUDSTACK-3686) Registering a template does not generate a usage event.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3686?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Saksham Srivastava reassigned CLOUDSTACK-3686: -- Assignee: Saksham Srivastava > Registering a template does not

[jira] [Resolved] (CLOUDSTACK-2508) Template usage should report both physical and virtual sizes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2508?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Saksham Srivastava resolved CLOUDSTACK-2508. Resolution: Fixed > Template usage should report both physical and

[jira] [Assigned] (CLOUDSTACK-3730) physical_size column in template_store_ref shows value as 0 when a template is created from a snapshot

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3730?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Saksham Srivastava reassigned CLOUDSTACK-3730: -- Assignee: Saksham Srivastava > physical_size column in templat

[jira] [Assigned] (CLOUDSTACK-3837) 3.0.6 to ASF 4.2 Upgrade: "cloud_usage" Database Schema Inconsistencies on the Upgraded Setup

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3837?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Saksham Srivastava reassigned CLOUDSTACK-3837: -- Assignee: Saksham Srivastava > 3.0.6 to ASF 4.2 Upgrade: "clou

[jira] [Assigned] (CLOUDSTACK-3835) 3.0.6 to ASF 4.2 Upgrade: "cloud" Database Schema Inconsistencies on the Upgraded Setup - Table "usage_event"

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3835?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Saksham Srivastava reassigned CLOUDSTACK-3835: -- Assignee: Saksham Srivastava > 3.0.6 to ASF 4.2 Upgrade: "clou

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-3837) 3.0.6 to ASF 4.2 Upgrade: "cloud_usage" Database Schema Inconsistencies on the Upgraded Setup

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3837?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13720709#comment-13720709 ] Saksham Srivastava commented on CLOUDSTACK-3837: I have added my chan

[jira] [Resolved] (CLOUDSTACK-3837) 3.0.6 to ASF 4.2 Upgrade: "cloud_usage" Database Schema Inconsistencies on the Upgraded Setup

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3837?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Saksham Srivastava resolved CLOUDSTACK-3837. Resolution: Fixed Marking it as resolved as the fix is pushed in.

[jira] [Resolved] (CLOUDSTACK-3835) 3.0.6 to ASF 4.2 Upgrade: "cloud" Database Schema Inconsistencies on the Upgraded Setup - Table "usage_event"

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3835?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Saksham Srivastava resolved CLOUDSTACK-3835. Resolution: Fixed Marking it as resolved as the fix is pushed in.

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-3686) Registering a template does not generate a usage event.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3686?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13720749#comment-13720749 ] Saksham Srivastava commented on CLOUDSTACK-3686: Fix available for re

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-3874) Update logrotation policy in cloud_early-config for log rotation on system vms

Saksham Srivastava created CLOUDSTACK-3874: -- Summary: Update logrotation policy in cloud_early-config for log rotation on system vms Key: CLOUDSTACK-3874 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDST

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-3791) [DevCloud] Download Template Fails with NPE

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3791?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13721598#comment-13721598 ] Saksham Srivastava commented on CLOUDSTACK-3791: I am seeing the same

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-3874) Update logrotation policy in cloud_early-config for log rotation on system vms

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3874?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Saksham Srivastava updated CLOUDSTACK-3874: --- Status: Ready To Review (was: In Progress) > Update logrotation pol

[jira] [Resolved] (CLOUDSTACK-3874) Update logrotation policy in cloud_early-config for log rotation on system vms

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3874?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Saksham Srivastava resolved CLOUDSTACK-3874. Resolution: Fixed > Update logrotation policy in cloud_early-confi

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-3791) [DevCloud] Download Template Fails with NPE

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3791?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13722276#comment-13722276 ] Saksham Srivastava commented on CLOUDSTACK-3791: Min, I am not seeing

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-4935) Adding same network to VM multiple times resulting in failure, No new NIC is generated each time

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13802731#comment-13802731 ] Saksham Srivastava commented on CLOUDSTACK-4935: I guess initially th

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-5342) Add NIC to virtual machine fails in KVM

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5342?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13846135#comment-13846135 ] Saksham Srivastava commented on CLOUDSTACK-5342: Hi Girish I see that

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-5486) [UI] List Template for non root admin account does not display tags for pubic templates

Saksham Srivastava created CLOUDSTACK-5486: -- Summary: [UI] List Template for non root admin account does not display tags for pubic templates Key: CLOUDSTACK-5486 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/brows

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-4572) findHostsForMigration API does not return correct host list

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4572?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13754879#comment-13754879 ] Saksham Srivastava commented on CLOUDSTACK-4572: Fix available for re

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-4572) findHostsForMigration API does not return correct host list

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4572?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Saksham Srivastava updated CLOUDSTACK-4572: --- Status: Ready To Review (was: In Progress) > findHostsForMigration

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-4572) findHostsForMigration API does not return correct host list

Saksham Srivastava created CLOUDSTACK-4572: -- Summary: findHostsForMigration API does not return correct host list Key: CLOUDSTACK-4572 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4572

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-4622) [IP Reservation][If a VM from guest network is added to network tier of VPC then IP reservation allows the CIDR to be a superset of Network CIDR for that VPC tier

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4622?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13765364#comment-13765364 ] Saksham Srivastava commented on CLOUDSTACK-4622: The issue I see is w

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-4622) [IP Reservation][If a VM from guest network is added to network tier of VPC then IP reservation allows the CIDR to be a superset of Network CIDR for that VPC tier

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4622?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13766538#comment-13766538 ] Saksham Srivastava commented on CLOUDSTACK-4622: Fix available for re

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-4622) [IP Reservation][If a VM from guest network is added to network tier of VPC then IP reservation allows the CIDR to be a superset of Network CIDR for that VPC tier

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4622?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Saksham Srivastava updated CLOUDSTACK-4622: --- Status: Ready To Review (was: In Progress) > [IP Reservation][If a

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-4807) Add unittests for methods in NetUtils

Saksham Srivastava created CLOUDSTACK-4807: -- Summary: Add unittests for methods in NetUtils Key: CLOUDSTACK-4807 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4807 Project: CloudStack

[jira] [Assigned] (CLOUDSTACK-4762) Enabling VGPU support for XenServer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4762?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Saksham Srivastava reassigned CLOUDSTACK-4762: -- Assignee: Saksham Srivastava > Enabling VGPU support for XenServer

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-3583) Management server stop is not removing the PID

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3583?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Saksham Srivastava updated CLOUDSTACK-3583: --- Status: Ready To Review (was: In Progress) > Management server stop is

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-3583) Management server stop is not removing the PID

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3583?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13795052#comment-13795052 ] Saksham Srivastava commented on CLOUDSTACK-3583: Fix is available for

[jira] [Resolved] (CLOUDSTACK-3583) Management server stop is not removing the PID

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3583?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Saksham Srivastava resolved CLOUDSTACK-3583. Resolution: Fixed > Management server stop is not removing the PID >

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-2130) UpdateDefaultNicForVirtualMachine api should also create usage events for updating new default network

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2130?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13657151#comment-13657151 ] Saksham Srivastava commented on CLOUDSTACK-2130: Added the 4 Usage ev

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-2130) UpdateDefaultNicForVirtualMachine api should also create usage events for updating new default network

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2130?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Saksham Srivastava updated CLOUDSTACK-2130: --- Status: Ready To Review (was: In Progress) > UpdateDefaultNicForVir

[jira] [Assigned] (CLOUDSTACK-2508) Template usage should report both physical and virtual sizes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2508?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Saksham Srivastava reassigned CLOUDSTACK-2508: -- Assignee: Saksham Srivastava > Template usage should report bo

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-2508) Template usage should report both physical and virtual sizes

Saksham Srivastava created CLOUDSTACK-2508: -- Summary: Template usage should report both physical and virtual sizes Key: CLOUDSTACK-2508 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2508

[jira] [Resolved] (CLOUDSTACK-2130) UpdateDefaultNicForVirtualMachine api should also create usage events for updating new default network

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2130?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Saksham Srivastava resolved CLOUDSTACK-2130. Resolution: Fixed > UpdateDefaultNicForVirtualMachine api should a

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-681) Dedicate Pod, Cluster or Host to a domain

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-681?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Saksham Srivastava updated CLOUDSTACK-681: -- Description: Currently in CloudStack architecture, domains can have dedicat

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-681) Dedicate Pod, Cluster or Host to a domain

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-681?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13666390#comment-13666390 ] Saksham Srivastava commented on CLOUDSTACK-681: --- Available for review at

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-2130) UpdateDefaultNicForVirtualMachine api should also create usage events for updating new default network

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2130?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13669205#comment-13669205 ] Saksham Srivastava commented on CLOUDSTACK-2130: I am generating 4 us

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-2130) UpdateDefaultNicForVirtualMachine api should also create usage events for updating new default network

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2130?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Saksham Srivastava updated CLOUDSTACK-2130: --- Status: Ready To Review (was: In Progress) > UpdateDefaultNicForVir

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-2130) UpdateDefaultNicForVirtualMachine api should also create usage events for updating new default network

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2130?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13669206#comment-13669206 ] Saksham Srivastava commented on CLOUDSTACK-2130: Available for review

[jira] [Resolved] (CLOUDSTACK-2130) UpdateDefaultNicForVirtualMachine api should also create usage events for updating new default network

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2130?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Saksham Srivastava resolved CLOUDSTACK-2130. Resolution: Fixed > UpdateDefaultNicForVirtualMachine api should a

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1012) Encrypt system.vm.password for 4.0 to 4.1 upgrades

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1012?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13674380#comment-13674380 ] Saksham Srivastava commented on CLOUDSTACK-1012: Available for review

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-1012) Encrypt system.vm.password for 4.0 to 4.1 upgrades

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1012?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Saksham Srivastava updated CLOUDSTACK-1012: --- Status: Ready To Review (was: In Progress) > Encrypt system.vm.pass

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-2873) [UI] Dedicating resources to accounts is using incorrect parameter for account name.

Saksham Srivastava created CLOUDSTACK-2873: -- Summary: [UI] Dedicating resources to accounts is using incorrect parameter for account name. Key: CLOUDSTACK-2873 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/C

[jira] [Assigned] (CLOUDSTACK-2167) The Vlan ranges displayed are not in asscending order.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Saksham Srivastava reassigned CLOUDSTACK-2167: -- Assignee: Saksham Srivastava > The Vlan ranges displayed are n

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-2167) The Vlan ranges displayed are not in asscending order.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Saksham Srivastava updated CLOUDSTACK-2167: --- Status: Ready To Review (was: In Progress) > The Vlan ranges displa

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-2167) The Vlan ranges displayed are not in asscending order.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13677960#comment-13677960 ] Saksham Srivastava commented on CLOUDSTACK-2167: Available for review

[jira] [Resolved] (CLOUDSTACK-1647) IP Reservation should not happen if the guest-vm cidr and network cidr is not same but their start ip and end ip are same.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1647?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Saksham Srivastava resolved CLOUDSTACK-1647. Resolution: Fixed > IP Reservation should not happen if the guest-

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-2894) After removing all the vlan ranges, physical_network table has an entry of '*' in vnet coulmn, should be NULL

Saksham Srivastava created CLOUDSTACK-2894: -- Summary: After removing all the vlan ranges, physical_network table has an entry of '*' in vnet coulmn, should be NULL Key: CLOUDSTACK-2894 URL: https://issues

[jira] [Assigned] (CLOUDSTACK-2950) VM craetion using the explicit dedication affinity group in the Root Domain is successful even if has no dedicated hosts.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2950?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Saksham Srivastava reassigned CLOUDSTACK-2950: -- Assignee: Saksham Srivastava > VM craetion using the explicit

  1   2   3   4   >