I support this approach to moving forward. - Gregory
--
IETF related email from
Gregory M. Lebovitz
Juniper Networks
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 8:05 AM, Grewal, Ken wrote:
> Hi Paul,
> I have no objections to this approach moving forward.
>
> Thanks,
> - Ken
>
>
> >-Original Message-
inline...
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 8:18 AM, Stephen Kent wrote:
> At 7:50 PM +0530 11/16/09, Bhatia, Manav (Manav) wrote:
>
>> This is an implementation specific optimization that has already been
>> solved in multiple implementations.
>>
>> Cheers, Manav
>>
>
> Is the phrase "implementation spec
inline...
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 8:39 AM, Stephen Kent wrote:
--snip--
> I am not suggesting that any aspect of your analysis is flawed. I am
> suggesting that before the WG chooses to further deprecate AH, it needs to
> document the analysis supporting this decision, not just cite a couple o
Additionally it will depend on the round trip time across the network
between the two peers.
Vendors who are selling network boxes that can do a large number of
simultaneous IKE negotiations tend to care more about simultaneous IKE SA
negotiations per second than they do the actual negotiation tim
