[IPsec] Re: Paul Wouters' Discuss on draft-ietf-ipsecme-g-ikev2-20: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2025-02-07 Thread Valery Smyslov
Hi Paul, > [ Removed everything where there is agreement ] I also removed topics that require no further discussion. > >> I wonder why the design for GSA_AUTH is not more genericly done, so > >> that it would be possible to mix regular IKE/Child SAs with GSAs ? It > >> seems things are now tied

[IPsec] Re: Paul Wouters' Discuss on draft-ietf-ipsecme-g-ikev2-20: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2025-02-07 Thread Paul Wouters
On Fri, 7 Feb 2025, Valery Smyslov wrote: Thanks Valery, I agree with all your proposed changes. Please roll it out as new draft :) Paul Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2025 10:07:43 From: Valery Smyslov Cc: 'Paul Wouters' , 'The IESG' , draft-ietf-ipsecme-g-ik...@ietf.org, ipsecme-cha...@ietf.org,

[IPsec] Paul Wouters' Yes on draft-ietf-ipsecme-g-ikev2-20: (with COMMENT)

2025-02-07 Thread Paul Wouters via Datatracker
Paul Wouters has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-ipsecme-g-ikev2-20: Yes When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://w