On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 11:22:00AM +0300, Valery Smyslov wrote:
> Hi Steffen,
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've read the document and I support it.
> >
> > One nit:
> >
> > The document talkes about 'anti-replay protection' which sounds a bit odd.
> > We
> > protect against replay, not anti-replay.
> >
Hi Steffen,
> Hi,
>
> I've read the document and I support it.
>
> One nit:
>
> The document talkes about 'anti-replay protection' which sounds a bit odd. We
> protect against replay, not anti-replay.
>
> ESP RFC 4303 talkes about 'anti-replay service' or just 'anti-replay'.
> Maybe the docume
