[IPsec] Fwd: draft-ietf-ipsecme-g-ikev2

2024-11-14 Thread Deb Cooley
Well, that was a rookie move. Deb -- Forwarded message - From: Deb Cooley Date: Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 1:36 PM Subject: draft-ietf-ipsecme-g-ikev2 To: , Cc: Hi, Before I put this draft into IETF Last Call, I have a few easy comments: Section 1.2, 4.4.1, Group-Wise: Group-wis

[IPsec] Re: Review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-qr-alt-04

2024-11-14 Thread Panwei (William)
Hi Valery, Thanks for your clarification. As “support” is not equal to “is configured to use”, I suggest the following modifications to the paragraph below in section 3.1, because the responder supporting both specifications can choose none to use if it is configured not to use PPK. OLD: N

[IPsec] Re: Comments regarding draft-wang-hybrid-kem-ikev2-frodo-02

2024-11-14 Thread Wang Guilin
Dear Valery, Thanks a lot for your reply. It is interested in knowing that RFC 9329 has specified how to use TCP as a transport for IKE and ESP. We will check the mechanism. Best wishes, Guilin From:Valery Smyslov mailto:smyslov.i...@gmail.com>> To:Wang Guilin mailto:wang.gui...@huawei.com>>

[IPsec] Re: Review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-qr-alt-04

2024-11-14 Thread Valery Smyslov
Good point, thank you. I made this change in my local copy. Regards, Valery. Hi Valery, Thanks for your clarification. As “support” is not equal to “is configured to use”, I suggest the following modifications to the paragraph below in section 3.1, because the responder supportin