Hi Tero,
I am also not aware of any IPR related to this draft.
Thanks,
Brian
> On Nov 6, 2024, at 9:00 AM, Valery Smyslov wrote:
>
> Hi Tero,
>
> I'm not aware of any IPR related to this draft.
>
> Regards,
> Valery.
>
>> I want to have confirmation from the authors whether there is any IPR
Hi,
I do not have strong opinion regarding type-1 (composite signatures) vs type-2
(non-composite signatures). But as it was already mentioned,
if we support non-composite signatures, then we in fact support both.
And if we support type-2 (non-composite), then I believe that RFC 4739 appr
Type-2 cannot be used with other protocols like TLS without protocol
changes, assuming a network function uses both TLS and IPSec protocols, it
will have to support both Type-1 and Type-2. Hence, the preference for
Type-1.
On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 at 22:51, Daniel Van Geest <
daniel.vange...@cryptonext-
Dear Valery,
Thanks for your questions on our draft IKEv2 with FrodoKEM.
You mentioned to better use TCP, but IPsec seems mainly used in the scenarios
with UDP.
You also mentioned something is "wrong", but I did not get the point.
Could you please explain this further?
Thanks a lot,
Guilin
Hi,
Here is a the latest version, draft-antony-ipsecme-ikev2-beet-mode-03. This
document is a straightforward I.D. that seeks a code point for IKEv2
negotiation. Since IETF 120, the primary updates in this version focus on
enhancing readability.
Please note, this ID does not address packet form
On Wed, 6 Nov 2024 14:26:53 +0100
Antony Antony wrote:
> Hi,
> Here is a the latest version,
> draft-antony-ipsecme-ikev2-beet-mode-03. This document is a
> straightforward I.D. that seeks a code point for IKEv2 negotiation.
> Since IETF 120, the primary updates in this version focus on
> enhanci
I agree with Daniel that type-1 and type-2 are not in confliction that we could
only choose one.
Both choices have pros and cons. Either one has their assumptions of the
suitable scenarios.
I also in favor of type-2. Because I think the hybridization is temporary and
pure PQ is the future, and
Dear Patrick,
As disccussed during your talk about FrodoKEM in the CFRG meeting, here is the
info about our draft.
Post-quantum Hybrid Key Exchange in the IKEv2 with FrodoKEM
draft-wang-hybrid-kem-ikev2-frodo-02
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wang-hybrid-kem-ikev2-frodo/
Cheers,
Guilin
On Nov 6, 2024, at 13:27, Antony Antony wrote:
>
> As such, this document can progress independently.
>
> I would like to request the working group’s adoption of
> draft-antony-ipsecme-ikev2-beet-mode-03. It is ready.
I am supportive of this work continuing here.
Paul
Hi,
Here’s the latest version, -05, of draft-antony-ipsecme-encrypted-esp-ping.
This update, since IETF 120, includes readability improvements and fixes
to the IP-TFS subtype, as well as the addition of an IKEv2 notification.
There’s been interest in this work, as reflected in feedback from recen
Hi Tero,
I'm not aware of any IPR related to this draft.
Regards,
Valery.
> I want to have confirmation from the authors whether there is any IPRs
known
> that has not yet been disclosed. Please respond to this email to confirm
this.
>
> Also if anybody else knows any IPRs that has not been alr
Thanks, Guilin! I'll take a look as soon as I get a chance.
Best,
-Patrick
From: Wang Guilin
Sent: Wednesday, November 6, 2024 6:20 AM
To: Patrick Longa
Cc: ipsec ; cfrg ; Wang Guilin
Subject: [CFRG] [IPsec]: FrodoKEM and its usage in IKemEv2
Dear Patrick,
As disccussed during your talk abo
Hi Guilin,
Dear Valery,
Thanks for your questions on our draft IKEv2 with FrodoKEM.
You mentioned to better use TCP, but IPsec seems mainly used in the
scenarios with UDP.
RFC 9329 defines how to use TCP as a transport for IKE and ESP.
This RFC was developed to
I support this work in IPsec.
Aside: I will work in parallel on a 7402-bis; not here.
On 11/6/24 08:26, Antony Antony wrote:
Hi,
Here is a the latest version, draft-antony-ipsecme-ikev2-beet-mode-03. This
document is a straightforward I.D. that seeks a code point for IKEv2
negotiation. Since
Hi Guilin,
Thank you for your offer. I am looking forward to working together on this
draft.
Cheers,
Leonie
Von: Wang Guilin
Gesendet: Dienstag, 5. November 2024 15:06
An: Bruckert, Leonie ; ipsec
Cc: Wang Guilin
Betreff: RE: [IPsec] Comments regarding draft-wang-hybrid-kem-ikev2-frodo-02
15 matches
Mail list logo
