Hi Éric,
please see inline.
Thank you, Valery, for the prompt reply.
See below for EVY>
Regards
-éric
From: Valery Smyslov mailto:s...@elvis.ru> >
Date: Thursday, 11 April 2024 at 15:23
To: Eric Vyncke (evyncke) mailto:evyn...@cisco.com> >,
'The IESG' mailto:i...@ietf.org> >
Hi Mahesh,
please, see inline.
HI Valery,
Thanks for responding to my comments.
Some of these comments are generated by a tool we use, and as it says, you
should feel free to ignore them if they are not applicable. Please see
inline for the remaining.
On Apr 11, 2024, at 12:56
Thank you, Valery, for your 2nd reply and for allowing me to reply w/o on-line
access to the I-D when I replied.
One last comment below as EVY2>
All comments were non-blocking anyway :)
-éric
From: Valery Smyslov
Date: Friday, 12 April 2024 at 09:40
To: Eric Vyncke (evyncke) , 'The IESG'
Cc:
On Wed, 10 Apr 2024, Marcus Ihlar via Datatracker wrote:
Thanks for your review.
Load balancing algorithms and policies are
likely best left as implementation details but I do think a paragraph in the
operational considerations section could be warranted.
We had some Linux details in there be
Hi Valery, hi Brian,
While looking at the latest version of draft-ietf-ipsecme-g-ikev2, I was
wondering if a public implementation is available? It would be interesting to
have a look at the implementation to get a better impression regarding the take
over of enhancements done for GDOI into G-I
> On Apr 12, 2024, at 12:52 AM, Valery Smyslov wrote:
>
> Hi Mahesh,
>
> please, see inline.
>
> HI Valery,
>
> Thanks for responding to my comments.
>
> Some of these comments are generated by a tool we use, and as it says, you
> should feel free to ignore them if they are not applic
