[IPsec] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-ipsecme-iptfs-19: (with COMMENT)

2022-09-08 Thread Éric Vyncke via Datatracker
Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-ipsecme-iptfs-19: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to htt

Re: [IPsec] Lars Eggert's Discuss on draft-ietf-ipsecme-iptfs-14: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2022-09-08 Thread Christian Hopps
Hi Lars [and Zahed] Lars, these remaining 2 DISCUSS changes (below) that you indicated you were OK with are now in the latest published draft. Can you clear your DISCUSS? Zahed, your DISCUSS was waiting for the new ECN text as well, can you also clear your DISCUSS too? Lars Eggert writes:

[IPsec] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's No Objection on draft-ietf-ipsecme-iptfs-19: (with COMMENT)

2022-09-08 Thread Zaheduzzaman Sarker via Datatracker
Zaheduzzaman Sarker has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-ipsecme-iptfs-19: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer

Re: [IPsec] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's Discuss on draft-ietf-ipsecme-iptfs-17: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2022-09-08 Thread Zaheduzzaman Sarker
Hi, I have now cleared my discuss. Thanks for addressing them. However, I was hoping the following comments would get addressed too, as I think they would improve the spec. # Section 2.4: I would like to have rational behind the two mode of operations. what are the pros and cons and when would an i