Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc8229bis-07: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to
https:/
Hi Éric,
thank you for your comments. Please see inline.
> Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc8229bis-07: Yes
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email
> addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to
Hello Valery,
Thank you for the prompt reply.
It looks like Erik Kline could be my twin brother as we often emit the same
comments. FYI, I never read other ADs' ballot to avoid being biased.
I agree with all your replies and explanations except when there is EV>
Regards
-éric
On 09/08/202
Robert Moskowitz writes:
> This latest ver is in response to comments recieved.
>
> Please review Appendix A that I have the RR properly set up.
I think the priority needs to be in decimal, and you are missing the
gateway address. I.e., at least the 4025 has examples as follows:
38.2.0.192.in-ad
Éric, please see my comments below.
For readability I removed some of the stuff we agreed upon.
> Hello Valery,
>
> Thank you for the prompt reply.
>
> It looks like Erik Kline could be my twin brother as we often emit the same
> comments. FYI, I never read other ADs' ballot to avoid being biase
This is the start of 2 week WGLC on the document, ending 2022-08-17.
Please submit your comments to the list, also send a note if you have
reviewed the document, so we can see how many people are interested in
getting this out.
--
kivi...@iki.fi
___
IPs
Paul Wouters has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc8229bis-07: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to
https:
On Tue, 9 Aug 2022, Éric Vyncke via Datatracker wrote:
### Section 3 No AH
Even if AH is nearly no more used, I wonder whether there is a reason why AH is
not supported by this I-D.
Because we dont wants it :)
RFC 3948 also only defines ESPinUDP and not AHinUDP.
### Section 3
```
Althou
Martin Duke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ipsecme-iptfs-13: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to
https://
On Mon, Aug 8, 2022 at 5:12 AM Valery Smyslov wrote:
> >
> > (Sec 9.1)
> > "TCP-in-TCP can also lead to "TCP meltdown", where stacked instances
> >of TCP can result in significant impacts to performance
> >[TCP-MELTDOWN]. For the case in this document, such meltdown can
> >occur when
Thanks for the thorough review! Comments inline..
Martin Duke via Datatracker writes:
Martin Duke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ipsecme-iptfs-13: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC
11 matches
Mail list logo
