I applied your comments on my local copy. Please see some additional
comments inline.
Yours,
Daniel
On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 12:30 PM Robert Moskowitz
wrote:
>
>
> On 5/12/22 11:58, Daniel Migault wrote:
>
> Hi Bob,
>
> I apologize for the delayed response. I am happy to go back to this
> documen
On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 4:48 PM Robert Moskowitz
wrote:
> Continuing at sec 6.1:
>
> Skipping 6.2 for now, as it will not be used for current use case (I
> realize I may have one for Manned Aircraft).
>
> Good til 7.2, then skipping 7.2 and 7.3 for now.
>
> I like 7.4 in that UDP gets compressed
Hi,
Please find an updated version of our draft describing how optimising the use
of count based SA. We would like the document to be adopted as a WG document.
Yours,
Daniel
From: internet-dra...@ietf.org
Sent: Friday, May 13, 2022 12:18 PM
To: Cong
Hi,
Please find an updated version of our document to handle packet fragmentation
over an IPv4 network. We believe we have considered all comments received so
far and we would like our document to be adopted as WG document.
Yours,
Daniel
From: intern
Hi,
Please find the document describing Diet-ESP. The compression mechanism is not
being described using SCHC. We initially thought of updating the document with
SCHC and so wait for SCHC to be published. On the other hand this is not
mandatory and we would like to understand if the WG has an
Hi,
Here is the description of the IKE payload to negotiate Diet-ESP. There is
probably some discussion to understand if one need to extend it to include some
SCHC profiles for example. I am happy to get any feed back regarding this
aspect. I also think the document is ready for adoption and
