HI Roman,
thank you for the review. Please see comments inline.
> Hi!
>
> I performed a AD review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc8229bis-05. Thanks for
> revising RFC8229 with this new
> guidance. Comments are below:
>
> ** The abstract notes that many of the document updates came from deployment
Valery Smyslov writes:
> Traditionally, IPsec specifications contain very few quantitatives
> concerning various timings. This is due to the belief that concrete
> timeouts don't affect interoperability. Instead, some very generic
> recommendations are usually given. See for example Section 2.4 of
