Re: [IPsec] John Scudder's No Objection on draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-intermediate-09: (with COMMENT)

OK thanks. Those changes would make the document clearer for me, at least. Regards, —John > On Mar 3, 2022, at 2:16 AM, Valery Smyslov wrote: > > > Hi John, > >> John Scudder has entered the following ballot position for >> draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-intermediate-09: No Objection >> >> When r

Re: [IPsec] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-intermediate-09: (with COMMENT)

Looks good to me. On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 10:40 PM Valery Smyslov wrote: > Hi Martin, > > > > For the proposed text, I would prefer something normative but if you think > that's unwise I'll accept your proposal. > > > > As Murray noticed, we can’t use normative language against > future

Re: [IPsec] New Version Notification for draft-liu-ipsecme-ikev2-mtu-dect-00.txt

Paul, I think your following concern is meaningful by further consideration. After all, a larger MTU can increase transmission efficiency. I think it would be appropriate to add the following mechanisms to provide the ability to increase MTU, please kindly share your opinion. - As paths over th