On Thu, 9 Dec 2021, Tobias Brunner wrote:
In the SELinux case, and using your example, could the client actually
propose "nfs-client in TSi and "nfs-server" in TSr? So the server could set
"nfs-client" on the inbound SA/policy and "nfs-server" on the corresponding
outbound SA/policy of the CH
Tero Kivinen writes:
> This is the start of 2 week WG adoption call for this document, ending
> 2021-11-22. Please send your reply about whether you support adopting
> this document as WG document or not.
We had some discussion on the mechanims defined in this draft, but
there was also lots of sup
Tero Kivinen writes:
> This is the start of 2 week WG adoption call for this document, ending
> 2021-11-22. Please send your reply about whether you support adopting
> this document as WG document or not.
There was much less support for this, but I think there is enough
interest in the WG to at le
We currently have two documents in the WGLC:
draft-ietf-ipsecme-g-ikev2: Group Key Management using IKEv2
and
draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc8229bis: TCP Encapsulation of IKE and IPsec Packets
Both of those documents have very little reviews or comments during
the WGLC, and I would like to get at least
