I agree with these suggestions.
Tero?
Thanks,
Chris.
> On Nov 2, 2021, at 7:49 AM, Lou Berger wrote:
>
> I'd prefer to see the SHOULD and MAY reversed -- intentionally introducing
> additional reordering is generally considered something to avoid. I'd also
> be fine with both being a MAY an
On Wed, 3 Nov 2021, Valery Smyslov wrote:
It can represent optionality of the security label.
An optional security label has no meaning. If you have
a real case of optional security labels, lets year it. Otherwise,
I think we should move on without supporting optional security
labels. From a s
Since we continue to have an unresolved issue on the iptfs draft, I think it's
best if we have a 10m slot to close it, and get the document shipped.
Thanks,
Chris.
> On Oct 31, 2021, at 2:39 PM, Tero Kivinen wrote:
>
> We will be meeting on Monday November 8th 12:00-14:00 UTC, so send me
> age
