Hi Paul,
> On Wed, 25 Aug 2021, Valery Smyslov wrote:
>
> > sorry for being late, the GGLC is already over, but I was really busy to
> > review the draft before.
>
> And sorry for my late response..
>
> > 1. Section 1.2.
> > The last para is erroneous here, since the immediately following the
I'd prefer to see the SHOULD and MAY reversed -- intentionally
introducing additional reordering is generally considered something to
avoid. I'd also be fine with both being a MAY and a recommendation for
this to be configurable.
Lou
On 10/31/2021 3:53 PM, Michael Richardson wrote:
Tero Kiv
On Tue, 2 Nov 2021, Valery Smyslov wrote:
1. Section 1.2.
The last para is erroneous here, since the immediately following the first para
of Section 1.3
states exactly the same with more details. Either remove it or rephrase and
move to 1.3 (e.g.
to keep provided example).
It is actually dif
