Hi,
This is an interesting draft. I would love to see a generic
solution for network paths and receiver use cases, such as RSS.
The RFC3948 specifies one pair of UDP ports 4500-4500.
Both the IKE flow and the ESP in UDP flow should use the same UDP flow.
The draft seems to suggest new destination
Hi David,
Thanks the review. I think the text in [1] addresses your concern. I will
probably publish the a new version today. Please see my responses inline.
Yours,
Daniel
[1]
https://github.com/mglt/draft-mglt-lwig-minimal-esp/pull/1/commits/fb9393a246298e37adcf2683afa2061a40b4ed89
-
Hi Chris,
> This version incorporates Valery's WGLC editorial suggestions with some minor
> tweaks.
I reviewed the diff and I think that my concerns are resolved. Thank you for
addressing them.
Regards,
Valery.
> Thanks,
> Chris.
>
> > On Mar 30, 2021, at 8:11 PM, internet-dra...@ietf.org wr
Hi Antony:
Below,
Cheers,
Paul
-Original Message-
From: IPsec [mailto:ipsec-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Antony Antony
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2021 3:32 AM
To: Bottorff, Paul ; IPsec
Cc: antony.ant...@secunet.com
Subject: Re: [IPsec] draft-xu-ipsecme-esp-in-udp-lb-07
Hi,
This
Thanks for the updates and clarification!
Op 31-03-2021 om 08:46 schreef Daniel Migault:
Hi David,
Thanks the review. I think the text in [1] addresses your concern. I will
probably publish the a new version today. Please see my responses inline.
Yours,
Daniel
[1]
https://github.com/mglt/d
