Re: [IPsec] WG adoption call for draft-smyslov-ipsecme-rfc8229bis

On Wed, 24 Feb 2021, Tero Kivinen wrote: This is the start of 1.5 week WG adoption call for this document, ending 2021-02-07 (just before our IPsecME session in IETF 110). Please send your reply about whether you support adopting this document as WG document or not. I am in favour of adoption.

[IPsec] [Cryptography] Direct public confirmation from Dr. Rogaway (fwd)

So now that OCB is finally free, do we want to implement it? :) I'm honestly not sure if the improvements of AES-GCM are worth it. I haven't heard of vulnerabilities in IKE/ESP wrt. IVs or counters. Paul -- Forwarded message -- Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2021 14:37:30 From: "Salz, Rich

Re: [IPsec] [Cryptography] Direct public confirmation from Dr. Rogaway (fwd)

IIRC the license has allowed OCB to be used for TLS for several years. They haven’t taken it up. There are no AES-OCB ciphersuites inhttps://www.iana.org/assignments/tls-parameters/tls-parameters.xml#tls-parameters-4 https://www.iana.org/assignments/tls-parameters/tls-parameters.xml#tls-paramet