[IPsec] Review of the draft-smyslov-ipsecme-rfc8229bis-02

I quickly reviewed the draft-smyslov-ipsecme-rfc8229bis-02, or more accurately I reviewed the diff between the rfc8229 and this draft [1] During the review I found this text: Additionally, since TCP headers are longer than UDP headers, and TCP encapsulation adds a 16-bit Length fie

[IPsec] The IPSECME WG has placed draft-smyslov-ipsecme-rfc8229bis in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

The IPSECME WG has placed draft-smyslov-ipsecme-rfc8229bis in state Call For Adoption By WG Issued (entered by Tero Kivinen) The document is available at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-smyslov-ipsecme-rfc8229bis/ ___ IPsec mailing list IPsec@

[IPsec] WG adoption call for draft-smyslov-ipsecme-rfc8229bis

This is the start of 1.5 week WG adoption call for this document, ending 2021-02-07 (just before our IPsecME session in IETF 110). Please send your reply about whether you support adopting this document as WG document or not. Our charter has item for: RFC8229, published in 2017, specifies

[IPsec] WGLC of the draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-intermediate

This is the start of 1.5 week WGLC on the document, ending 2021-03-07, i.e. just before the IPsecME WG meeting in IETF 110. Please submit your comments to the list, also send a note if you have reviewed the document, so we can see how many people are interested in getting this out. -- kivi...@iki.