Hi,
I think that in its current form the draft is too focused on a single
application for
the Aggregation and Fragmentation mode - IP-TFS. From architectural
point of view I'd like to see the draft first defining the mechanism itself
and then describing possible applications for it, focusing on
Hi Valery,
I think you make a number of good mechanism specific technical points
that are worth addressing in the document, but I think that
recasting/redirecting this work goes too far. This work has always been
focused on a specific application (TFS) and it's utility beyond that
applicatio
> On Feb 3, 2021, at 10:38 PM, Sean Turner wrote:
>
> Hi! I mostly just have nits, but there are a couple of questions interspersed
> below.
Hi Sean,
Thanks so much for this very thorough review!
I have made the vast majority of the suggested changes with only a few style
exceptions (and i
> On Feb 8, 2021, at 6:44 AM, Valery Smyslov wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I think that in its current form the draft is too focused on a single
> application for
> the Aggregation and Fragmentation mode - IP-TFS. From architectural
> point of view I'd like to see the draft first defining the mechanism
