Re: [IPsec] My review of the draft-ietf-ipsecme-iprfs-05.txt

2021-01-24 Thread Tero Kivinen
Christian Hopps writes: > I have published a new version of the draft which I believe > addresses the issues you raise in your WGLC readiness review below. > As such, I'd like to request the document enter WGLC. Thanks, I will start WGLC soon. > The lack of the assumption is also more clear wit

[IPsec] WGLC for draft-ietf-ipsecme-iptfs

2021-01-24 Thread Tero Kivinen
This is the start of 3 week WGLC on the document, ending 2021-02-15. Please submit your comments to the list, also send a note if you have reviewed the document, so we can see how many people are interested in getting this out. -- kivi...@iki.fi ___ IPs

[IPsec] The IPSECME WG has placed draft-fedyk-ipsecme-yang-iptfs in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

2021-01-24 Thread IETF Secretariat
The IPSECME WG has placed draft-fedyk-ipsecme-yang-iptfs in state Call For Adoption By WG Issued (entered by Tero Kivinen) The document is available at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-fedyk-ipsecme-yang-iptfs/ ___ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf

[IPsec] WG adoption call for draft-fedyk-ipsecme-yang-iptfs

2021-01-24 Thread Tero Kivinen
This is the start of 3 week WG adoption call for this document, ending 2021-02-15. Please send your reply about whether you support adopting this document as WG document or not. This document is not explictly mentioned in our charter, but as this is part of the traffic flow confidentiality work th