Re: [IPsec] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-ipsecme-ipv6-ipv4-codes-05: (with COMMENT)

Hi Murray, Thank you. Fixed. See the diff at: https://tinyurl.com/ike-v4v6-codes Cheers, Med > -Message d'origine- > De : Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker [mailto:nore...@ietf.org] > Envoyé : lundi 14 décembre 2020 07:13 > À : The IESG > Cc : draft-ietf-ipsecme-ipv6-ipv4-co...@ietf.or

[IPsec] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-ipsecme-ipv6-ipv4-codes-05: (with COMMENT)

Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-ipsecme-ipv6-ipv4-codes-05: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please ref

Re: [IPsec] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-ipsecme-ipv6-ipv4-codes-05: (with COMMENT)

Bonjour Eric, Thank you for the comments. Please see inline. Cheers, Med > -Message d'origine- > De : Éric Vyncke via Datatracker [mailto:nore...@ietf.org] > Envoyé : lundi 14 décembre 2020 09:17 > À : The IESG > Cc : draft-ietf-ipsecme-ipv6-ipv4-co...@ietf.org; ipsecme- > cha...@ie

Re: [IPsec] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-ipsecme-ipv6-ipv4-codes-05: (with COMMENT)

Re-bonjour Med, The suggested text sounds good to me. About the "MUST" in section 5, let's agree that we disagree on this one but this is NOT blocking. There is another "repsonder" at the end of section 5 and I loved your reference to RFC 8801 (Monday morning smile!) Regards -éric -Orig

[IPsec] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-ipsecme-ipv6-ipv4-codes-05: (with COMMENT)

Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-ipsecme-ipv6-ipv4-codes-05: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please r

Re: [IPsec] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-ipsecme-ipv6-ipv4-codes-05: (with COMMENT)

Hi Rob, Sure. Added a pointer to rfc6459#section-3.2 where definitions of PDP context + PDP types (v4, v6, v4v6) can be found. You can see a diff here: https://tinyurl.com/ike-v4v6-codes. Thank you. Cheers, Med > -Message d'origine- > De : Robert Wilton via Datatracker [mailto:nor

Re: [IPsec] YANG for IP-TFS

Is there anything holding this up? Thanks, Chris. > On Dec 3, 2020, at 11:37 AM, Don Fedyk wrote: > > Hi > > As asked in the 109 meeting, could we start the call for adoption for > draft-fedyk-ipsecme-yang-iptfs-01 > ? > > Th