Re: [IPsec] Data Center changes to ESP, Re: leading versus trailing ICV

2020-09-21 Thread Michael Rossberg
Hi, > >> I think that a way to negotiate this is as if it was unique cipher. > > BTW: I recognize that this might require a new value for each cipher. > > As such, it's not a great long term solution, but I would claim that it > probably applies to a few ciphers very specifically at first. > >

Re: [IPsec] Data Center changes to ESP, Re: leading versus trailing ICV

2020-09-21 Thread Michael Richardson
Michael Rossberg wrote: >>> I think that a way to negotiate this is as if it was unique cipher. >> >> BTW: I recognize that this might require a new value for each cipher. >> >> As such, it's not a great long term solution, but I would claim that it >> probably applies to

Re: [IPsec] Last Call: (Software-Defined Networking (SDN)-based IPsec Flow Protection) to Proposed Standard

2020-09-21 Thread Fernando Pereñíguez García
Hi Tom, Thanks for your feedback and help. We are working to address your comments in the next version of the draft (v09). Please, see our answers below, identified with the tag "[Authors]". El mar., 25 ago. 2020 a las 12:23, tom petch () escribió: > Looking at the YANG module from a different