Hi Paul,
> Why is this using a seperate CP payload type per encrypted DNS type?
> This means that for a DNS server supporting DoT, DoH and DoQ, it needs
> to send 3 separate payloads. Why not send 1 CP payload that contains a
> bitmask specifying which services it supports?
Well, from my understa
Michael Richardson wrote:
> Hi, I finally got to watching your presentation on the IETF youtube
channel.
> the illustration at https://youtu.be/IrNsFAPhx-Q?t=3410, which I guess is
> also at:
>
https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/108/slides/slides-108-ipsecme-proposed-improvements-
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 03:51:11PM +0300, Valery Smyslov wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> > Why is this using a seperate CP payload type per encrypted DNS type?
> > This means that for a DNS server supporting DoT, DoH and DoQ, it needs
> > to send 3 separate payloads. Why not send 1 CP payload that contains
