Re: [IPsec] IPsec profile feedback wanted (draft autonomic control plane)

2020-06-22 Thread Valery Smyslov
Hi Toerless, > Thanks, Valery > > let me pick up the one point i have no clear text solution for yet. > > On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 10:52:02AM +0300, Valery Smyslov wrote: > > Hi Toerless, > [...] > > Well, the example you provided doesn't work. In IKEv2 first > > the responder sends a list of TA

Re: [IPsec] IPsec profile feedback wanted (draft autonomic control plane)

2020-06-22 Thread Valery Smyslov
Hi Ben, > It's not quite "you know who you are talking to based on IP", but more of > "under this precondition, you know that the peer should be part of the same > ACP domain, and thus using the same TA as you". But you don't know exactly > which peer in the domain, and thus which EE cert, you're

Re: [IPsec] IPsec profile feedback wanted (draft autonomic control plane)

2020-06-22 Thread 'Toerless Eckert'
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 05:51:16PM +0300, Valery Smyslov wrote: > Hi Ben, > > > It's not quite "you know who you are talking to based on IP", but more of > > "under this precondition, you know that the peer should be part of the same > > ACP domain, and thus using the same TA as you". But you don

Re: [IPsec] IPsec profile feedback wanted (draft autonomic control plane)

2020-06-22 Thread 'Toerless Eckert'
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 05:42:00PM +0300, Valery Smyslov wrote: > And I think that prohibiting sending CERTREQ is really bad idea for the > profile. > The better idea is to require ignoring CERTREQ content on receipt if you > think > it's not useful in your use case, but not banning sending it.