Re: [IPsec] Clarifications and Implementation Guidelines for using TCP Encapsulation in IKEv2 draft

Hi Valery, Thanks for bringing this up again. Would you be interested in making this an RFC8229bis instead? I think it would be most useful for an implementer to fold some of these clarifications into the main text itself. How do you feel about that? Best, Tommy > On Apr 28, 2020, at 2:54 AM,

Re: [IPsec] Clarifications and Implementation Guidelines for using TCP Encapsulation in IKEv2 draft

On Wed, 29 Apr 2020, Tommy Pauly wrote: Thanks for bringing this up again. Would you be interested in making this an RFC8229bis instead? I think it would be most useful for an implementer to fold some of these clarifications into the main text itself. How do you feel about that? That might

Re: [IPsec] Clarifications and Implementation Guidelines for using TCP Encapsulation in IKEv2 draft

Hi Tommy, > Hi Valery, > > Thanks for bringing this up again. Would you be interested in making this an > RFC8229bis instead? I think it would be most useful for an implementer to fold > some of these clarifications into the main text itself. How do you feel about > that? I'd be happy to do it.

Re: [IPsec] Clarifications and Implementation Guidelines for using TCP Encapsulation in IKEv2 draft

[With chair hat on] Yes, the charter says that we are to make a guidance document. If the working group feels that it’s better to put the specification and guidance in a single document, we can work on that and clear it with the ADs. Charters can be modified. Yoav > On 29 Apr 2020, at 18:42,