On 1/12/20 10:35 PM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 12:01:39AM -0800, Dan Harkins wrote:
On 12/23/19 10:46 AM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
Since we're in pedantic process mode...
[snip]
Perhaps something like "IKEv1 is no longer relevant for Internet
systems" would work, though I su
On Mon, 13 Jan 2020, Dan Harkins wrote:
IKEv1 is done, it's over, it's dead. It's been like that for more than a
decade.
I think there is a big difference between "done developing it" and "done
running it". A decade ago almost everything was IKEv1. Today, with the
exception of Android and ten
On Wed, Jan 08, 2020 at 05:41:59PM +0300, Valery Smyslov wrote:
>
> > Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for
> > draft-ietf-ipsecme-qr-ikev2-10: No Objection
> >
> > --
> > COMMENT:
> > --
Hi Ben,
> On Wed, Jan 08, 2020 at 05:41:59PM +0300, Valery Smyslov wrote:
> >
> > > Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for
> > > draft-ietf-ipsecme-qr-ikev2-10: No Objection
> > >
> > > --
> > > COMMENT:
> > >
Hi!
> -Original Message-
> From: Benjamin Kaduk
> Sent: Monday, January 13, 2020 12:58 PM
> To: Valery Smyslov
> Cc: Roman Danyliw ; 'The IESG' ;
> ipsec@ietf.org; ipsecme-cha...@ietf.org; david.walterm...@nist.gov; draft-
> ietf-ipsecme-qr-ik...@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [IPsec] Roman Dan
On Tue, Jan 07, 2020 at 09:46:43PM -0800, Barry Leiba via Datatracker wrote:
> Barry Leiba has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-ipsecme-qr-ikev2-10: No Objection
>
[...]
>
> I also find it interesting that Alexey thought you needed to add a normative
> reference for “ASCII”,
Paul Wouters wrote:
>> IKEv1 is done, it's over, it's dead. It's been like that for more than
>> a decade.
> I think there is a big difference between "done developing it" and
> "done running it". A decade ago almost everything was IKEv1. Today,
> with the exception of Androi
