On Fri, 27 Dec 2019, Valery Smyslov wrote:
The successful exchange of SECLABELS_SUPPORTED notification only
ensures that the responder won't ignore SECLABEL notification
in requests to create IPsec SAs.
Over the hollidays, I tried to show weaknesses in this approach,
but failed. I think Valery
On Mon, 23 Dec 2019, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
"this document" (i.e., the RFC-to-be) does not actually effecuate the move
to Historic status; the separate "status-change" document does so. Looking
at a recent example in RFC 8429, we see this phrased akin to "Accordingly,
IKEv1 has been moved to His
