Re: [IPsec] [I2nsf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-i2nsf-sdn-ipsec-flow-protection-05.txt

Hi Valery: > El 22 jul 2019, a las 18:07, Valery Smyslov escribió: > > Hi Yoav, > > I think that it is not the performance of the SC that would matter, > but the possible delays in the network. If we think of the network > connecting the SC and the NSFs as of one close to "ideal", then we have

Re: [IPsec] [I2nsf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-i2nsf-sdn-ipsec-flow-protection-05.txt

Hi Rafa, Hi Valery: El 22 jul 2019, a las 18:07, Valery Smyslov mailto:smyslov.i...@gmail.com> > escribió: Hi Yoav, I think that it is not the performance of the SC that would matter, but the possible delays in the network. If we think of the network connecting the SC and the

[IPsec] WGLC on draft-ietf-ipsecme-ipv6-ipv4-codes

This message starts a working group last call (WGLC) on draft-ietf-ipsecme-ipv6-ipv4-codes, which will conclude on August 16, 2019 at 23:59 UTC . Please review and provide feedback on the -03 version (

[IPsec] IPsecME 105 Montreal preliminary minutes

Here is preliminary minutes, if you have any comments, additions etc to them, send them to chairs. Thanks to mcr to taking the minutes. -- # IPsecME WG ## IETF 105, Montreal * Date: 2019-07-23 * Time: 15:20-16:50 (90 min) * Ro

[IPsec] Heads up: IDR meeting on Wednesday

Hi This may be of interest to IPsec folks. The IDR working group is meeting tomorrow and has several IPsec-related items on its agenda: Secure EVPN - where BGP is used instead of IKEv2 to key IPsec and distribute policy. BGP Signaled IPsec Tunnel Configuration - where IKEv2 is configured by BGP