david.bl...@emc.com writes:
> It's more than a decision to not include that capability - IKEv1 exchanges
> cannot be protected with combined mode algorithms without significant
> incompatible change to IKEv1, as explained in Section 1 of RFC 5282:
That is clear, I do not think anybody even dreams
Hi Tero,
I think we're in violent agreement on:
> I am very worried when people start implementing those ciphers to
> IKEv1, as there is no way to know which features of the RFC4303 they
> decide to include too. I agree that completely removing them is not
> the way we want to go forward, but I w
