[IPsec] I-D Action:draft-ietf-ipsecme-ipsec-ha-05.txt

2010-06-10 Thread Internet-Drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the IP Security Maintenance and Extensions Working Group of the IETF. Title : IPsec Cluster Problem Statement Author(s) : Y. Nir Filename:

Re: [IPsec] AD review: draft-ietf-ipsecme-ipsec-ha

2010-06-10 Thread Yoav Nir
Hi Sean. I have just submitted version -05 which addresses most (but not all) of your comments. Here's a list of the exceptions (hope I didn't miss any) #2. I've worded the abstract a little differently. Main difference is adding to "gaps in existing standards" the words "and their implementati

Re: [IPsec] AD review: draft-ietf-ipsecme-ipsec-ha

2010-06-10 Thread Sean Turner
Yoav Nir wrote: Hi Sean. I have just submitted version -05 which addresses most (but not all) of your comments. Here's a list of the exceptions (hope I didn't miss any) #2. I've worded the abstract a little differently. Main difference is adding to "gaps in existing standards" the words "and

Re: [IPsec] AD review: draft-ietf-ipsecme-ipsec-ha

2010-06-10 Thread Yoav Nir
On Jun 10, 2010, at 6:39 PM, Sean Turner wrote: > Yoav Nir wrote: > >> #13, #15, a few more (no MUST/SHOULD/MAY language). I have two issues with >> this. The first, is that this document is a problem statement, and intended >> to be INFORMATIONAL. No gateway is ever going to be said to "imple

Re: [IPsec] AD review: draft-ietf-ipsecme-ipsec-ha

2010-06-10 Thread Sean Turner
Yoav Nir wrote: On Jun 10, 2010, at 6:39 PM, Sean Turner wrote: Yoav Nir wrote: #13, #15, a few more (no MUST/SHOULD/MAY language). I have two issues with this. The first, is that this document is a problem statement, and intended to be INFORMATIONAL. No gateway is ever going to be said to

Re: [IPsec] AD review: draft-ietf-ipsecme-ipsec-ha

2010-06-10 Thread Yoav Nir
Done in -06 On Jun 10, 2010, at 7:17 PM, Sean Turner wrote: > Yoav Nir wrote: >> On Jun 10, 2010, at 6:39 PM, Sean Turner wrote: >> >>> Yoav Nir wrote: >>> #13, #15, a few more (no MUST/SHOULD/MAY language). I have two issues with this. The first, is that this document is a problem s

[IPsec] I-D Action:draft-ietf-ipsecme-ipsec-ha-06.txt

2010-06-10 Thread Internet-Drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the IP Security Maintenance and Extensions Working Group of the IETF. Title : IPsec Cluster Problem Statement Author(s) : Y. Nir Filename:

[IPsec] Last Call: draft-ietf-ipsecme-ipsec-ha (IPsec Cluster Problem Statement) to Informational RFC

2010-06-10 Thread The IESG
The IESG has received a request from the IP Security Maintenance and Extensions WG (ipsecme) to consider the following document: - 'IPsec Cluster Problem Statement ' as an Informational RFC The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action.

[IPsec] which is better SSL/TLS or IPsec for embedded networking products

2010-06-10 Thread rahul bharadhwaj
Hi For networking embedded products like scanner , printer or Multi Function devices, which is better to have SSL/TLS or IPSec ? I came to know that SSL is also capable to provide security for scanning and printing apart from HTTPS for web pages. So, please let me have inputs on this comparisio