Hi,
We posted the proposed resolution 2 days ago, and have heard no objections on
the list. So I'd like to ask the editors of the Traffic Visibility draft to
revise the draft in light of this resolution, and close all other issues that
were raised by the IESG (there were quite a few:
https://d
This is my first part of my review of ikev2bis document. This includes
changes based on going through section 1.
--
Section 1 defines following terms: IKE SA, Child SA, message, request,
response, and exchange. The document uses s
> Section 1.4 says that
>
>INFORMATIONAL exchanges MUST ONLY occur
>after the initial exchanges and are cryptographically protected with
>the negotiated keys.
>
> This does not match the 1.5 which says we can send INFORMATIONAL
> exchanges also outside the IKE SA.
I think
Greetings again. Yaron and Pasi and I have put our heads together on the seven
proposed new work items for the WG. Of the seven, we propose that four go ahead
as WG work items and three not; see the descriptions below.
We will turn in this proposed rechartering within a week, but are quite open
