Re: [IPsec] WESP - Roadmap Ahead

2009-11-17 Thread Gregory Lebovitz
inline... On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 8:18 AM, Stephen Kent wrote: > At 7:50 PM +0530 11/16/09, Bhatia, Manav (Manav) wrote: > >> This is an implementation specific optimization that has already been >> solved in multiple implementations. >> >> Cheers, Manav >> > > Is the phrase "implementation spec

Re: [IPsec] WESP - Roadmap Ahead

2009-11-17 Thread Gregory Lebovitz
inline... On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 8:39 AM, Stephen Kent wrote: --snip-- > I am not suggesting that any aspect of your analysis is flawed. I am > suggesting that before the WG chooses to further deprecate AH, it needs to > document the analysis supporting this decision, not just cite a couple o

Re: [IPsec] WESP - Roadmap Ahead

2009-11-17 Thread Jack Kohn
Gregory, Do you see how WESP can be used in KARP? Jack On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 12:49 AM, Gregory Lebovitz wrote: > inline... > > On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 8:39 AM, Stephen Kent wrote: > --snip-- > >> >> I am not suggesting that any aspect of your analysis is flawed. I am >> suggesting that befo

[IPsec] Ensuring future extensibility for WESP

2009-11-17 Thread Yaron Sheffer
Hi, The recent draft on extending WESP which was presented in Hiroshima, explains why the current WESP is *not* extensible, and we would need a new version number if we are to add any extensions in the future. It is up to the WG to decide whether or not we want to adopt the draft, given that m