Bhatia, Manav (Manav) writes:
> And the reason why you might want to use WESP is to prioritize
> certain protocol packets over the others, as is normally done for v4
> control packets (e.g. OSPFv3 HELLOs and ACKs over other OSPFv3
> packets)
You cannot do that, as if the packets get reordered mor
On 13 Nov 2009, at 10:10, Murthy N Srinivas-B22237 wrote:
> Amjad,
>
> AAA Server (Radius server) is configured with
> 1.domain/realm part of the EAP Identity as the "user name".
> 2.Along with this we can configure a radius attribue with a unique
> identifier.This identifier is sent by AAA serv
This is an implementation specific optimization that has already been solved in
multiple implementations.
Cheers, Manav
> -Original Message-
> From: Tero Kivinen [mailto:kivi...@iki.fi]
> Sent: Monday, November 16, 2009 6.39 PM
> To: Bhatia, Manav (Manav)
> Cc: ipsec@ietf.org
> Subject:
At 7:50 PM +0530 11/16/09, Bhatia, Manav (Manav) wrote:
This is an implementation specific optimization that has already
been solved in multiple implementations.
Cheers, Manav
Is the phrase "implementation specific" a euphemism for non-standard?
Steve
...
Divine guidance is, I suppose, one way to do protocol design, but it
could lead to *real* religious wars
an appropriate caution given my typo :-).
>
Also, note that IPSO and CIPSO are examples of options that were
discussed at the IPSECME meeting this week, where there is a need
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 11:39:30AM -0500, Stephen Kent wrote:
> >Or put the labels in the SA, since especially for IPSO you probably
> >want cryptographic separation of different security levels.
>
> There are various options here. I know of devices that have opted to
> use ESP in tunnel mode t
There multiple "implementation specific" optimizations available. One
such optimization that is currently in use in multiple platforms is:
Do the seq number check, and then place the packets in different
priority queues/paths based on the kind of packet it is. Proprietary
ASICs on the routers can
Tero,
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 6:39 PM, Tero Kivinen wrote:
> Bhatia, Manav (Manav) writes:
>> And the reason why you might want to use WESP is to prioritize
>> certain protocol packets over the others, as is normally done for v4
>> control packets (e.g. OSPFv3 HELLOs and ACKs over other OSPFv3
>>
