Re: [IPsec] #28: Obtaining src/dest IP addresses for UDP-encapsulated transport mode ESP

2009-08-28 Thread Tero Kivinen
Scott C Moonen writes: > 1) I still prefer to echo back TS payloads as I described. I realize that > the TS payloads are the only opportunity that IKEv2 has to reproduce the > effect of IKEv1's NAT-OA payloads. But using the traffic selectors in > this way -- and only if the responder ends up

Re: [IPsec] SCTP Multihoming with IPSec (RFC 3554)

2009-08-28 Thread Tero Kivinen
Bhaskar Dutta writes: > As Tero pointed out, the support is there, but he doubts if any real > testing has been > done. Once I figure out how to specify the configuration with > ipsec-tools I am planning > to test it out thoroughly. I talked only about our own implementation (quicksec), not about

Re: [IPsec] #28: Obtaining src/dest IP addresses for UDP-encapsulated transport mode ESP

2009-08-28 Thread Scott C Moonen
Tero, changing the MUST to MAY is ok. If we choose SHOULD then I would prefer to present alternatives, something to the effect of "SHOULD either [do what you proposed] or accept the proposal with the use of tunnel mode, as appropriate." Scott Moonen (smoo...@us.ibm.com) z/OS Communications Se