[IPsec] review of draft-solinas-rfc4753bis-00.txt

2009-07-13 Thread Dan Harkins
Hi, I have reviewed this draft and would like these comments to be treated just like any other last call comments. This draft will obsolete RFC 4753 (if approved) and before it does I would like to see it slightly modified to address a discrepancy between RFC 4753 and RFC 5114, both of whi

Re: [IPsec] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-ipsecme-traffic-visibility-05

2009-07-13 Thread gabriel montenegro
Hi Yoav,   Good catch,  we say offset *to* what, but we don’t say *from* where.   Among the co-authors, we'd like to suggest this as a simple text change to address this:   OLD:    HdrLen, 8 bits: Offset to the beginning of the Payload Data in    octets.   NEW:    HdrLen, 8 bits: Offset from the

Re: [IPsec] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-ipsecme-traffic-visibility-05

2009-07-13 Thread gabriel montenegro
Brian Swander notes that we should be explicit about the IV which may be present. It may be clear that this is the intention, but I agree that it is best to be explicit. This is what we suggest in light of this:   NEW:    HdrLen, 8 bits: Offset from the beginning of the WESP header to    the be

Re: [IPsec] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-ipsecme-traffic-visibility-05

2009-07-13 Thread Yoav Nir
Works for me. From: gabriel montenegro [mailto:g_e_montene...@yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 9:21 PM To: Yoav Nir; Yaron Sheffer; ipsec@ietf.org Subject: Re: [IPsec] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-ipsecme-traffic-visibility-05 Brian Swander notes that we should