Vijay Devarapalli wrote:
> > And having these two cases is more complex than having just one
> > (IKE_SA is not used for any more exchanges). What benefits does
> > this additional complexity (both in spec and in implementation)
> > get us?
> >
> > If nothing, let's just remove it
>
> When th
Yaron Sheffer wrote:
> > The current ikev2-resumption draft, on the other hand, seems to
> > assume a quite different model, where resumption replaces the old
> > connection, and can be done only if the old connection was
> > interrupted.
> >
> > This would seem to preclude one case discussed ear
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the IP Security Maintenance and Extensions Working
Group of the IETF.
Title : Wrapped ESP for Traffic Visibility
Author(s) : K. Grewal, et al.
File
All,
Updated draft for traffic visibility has been posted. Only changes since rev-03
is text related to the flags handling, as suggested by Yaron Sheffer.
Look forward to your feedback.
Thanks,
- Ken
>-Original Message-
>From: ipsec-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipsec-boun...@ietf.org] O
