On 5/10/22 08:25, Paul Wouters wrote:
On May 10, 2022, at 07:59, Robert Moskowitz
wrote:
20 ENCR_AES_GCM_16
and what RFC 8750 defined:
30 ENCR_AES_GCM_16_IIV
The only difference is a suffix "_IIV".
Actually, I thought that was the implicit IV size. And thus this was
some kin
On 5/10/22 08:25, Paul Wouters wrote:
On May 10, 2022, at 07:59, Robert Moskowitz
wrote:
20 ENCR_AES_GCM_16
and what RFC 8750 defined:
30 ENCR_AES_GCM_16_IIV
The only difference is a suffix "_IIV".
Actually, I thought that was the implicit IV size. And thus this was
some kin
On May 10, 2022, at 07:59, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
>
>
>> 20ENCR_AES_GCM_16
>>
>> and what RFC 8750 defined:
>>
>> 30ENCR_AES_GCM_16_IIV
>>
>> The only difference is a suffix "_IIV".
>
> Actually, I thought that was the implicit IV size. And thus this was some
> kind of AND con
On 5/10/22 01:37, Valery Smyslov wrote:
Hi Bob,
I just noticed that 8750 defines one algorithm number for aes-gcm:
30 | ENCR_AES_GCM_16_IIV| RFC 8750
But rfc 4106 defined 3:
18 for AES-GCM with an 8 octet ICV;
19 for AES-GCM with a 12 octet ICV; and
2
Hi Bob,
> I just noticed that 8750 defines one algorithm number for aes-gcm:
>
> 30 | ENCR_AES_GCM_16_IIV| RFC 8750
>
> But rfc 4106 defined 3:
>
>18 for AES-GCM with an 8 octet ICV;
>19 for AES-GCM with a 12 octet ICV; and
>20 for AES-GCM with a 16 octet I
