Re: [IPsec] IKEv2-bis comments: 2.17 and onwards (#170)

2010-01-28 Thread Pasi.Eronen
Tero Kivinen wrote: > pasi.ero...@nokia.com writes: > > Paul Hoffman wrote: > > > > > >B.1 (Group 1): We may want to add: "Use of this group is NOT > > > RECOMMENDED." > > > > > > Please open a tracker issue for this. Even though this is obvious, > > > it is a tad late to be suggesting new normativ

Re: [IPsec] IKEv2-bis comments: 2.17 and onwards (#170)

2010-01-26 Thread Tero Kivinen
pasi.ero...@nokia.com writes: > Paul Hoffman wrote: > > > >B.1 (Group 1): We may want to add: "Use of this group is NOT > > RECOMMENDED." > > > > Please open a tracker issue for this. Even though this is obvious, it > > is a tad late to be suggesting new normative language. > > This "NOT RECOMME

Re: [IPsec] IKEv2-bis comments: 2.17 and onwards (#170)

2010-01-26 Thread Pasi.Eronen
Paul Hoffman wrote: > >B.1 (Group 1): We may want to add: "Use of this group is NOT > RECOMMENDED." > > Please open a tracker issue for this. Even though this is obvious, it > is a tad late to be suggesting new normative language. This "NOT RECOMMENDED" would belong in an update to RFC 4307, not