Lou Berger writes:
> Hi Tero,
>
> You said:
>
> On 11/9/2021 5:11 AM, Tero Kivinen wrote:
> > I think there is still bit of tweaking that can be done,
>
> Is this tweak being made as a blocking comment by the document Shepherd
> or a non-blocking comment as a contributor?
No. It is just a comm
On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 10:05:05AM -0500, Lou Berger wrote:
> Hi Tero,
>
> You said:
>
> On 11/9/2021 5:11 AM, Tero Kivinen wrote:
> > I think there is still bit of tweaking that can be done,
>
> Is this tweak being made as a blocking comment by the document Shepherd
> or a non-blocking comment
Hi Tero,
You said:
On 11/9/2021 5:11 AM, Tero Kivinen wrote:
I think there is still bit of tweaking that can be done,
Is this tweak being made as a blocking comment by the document Shepherd
or a non-blocking comment as a contributor?
If it's a blocking comment -- Sure let's make whatever c
I believe this is a good time to apply KISS method.
We have a lost packet timer and additionally this is the "in order delivery"
mode. Let's not make this more complex to try and eek out every ounce of potential,
especially given we are already documenting 2 possible receiver behaviors (instea
Paul Wouters writes:
On Mon, 8 Nov 2021, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote:
Filename: draft-ietf-ipsecme-iptfs-12.txt
A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ipsecme-iptfs-12
Looks good to me other than a typo: s/the t
I've read the diff, and it looks good to me.
--
Michael Richardson , Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
IPsec mailing list
IPsec@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
On Mon, 8 Nov 2021, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote:
Filename: draft-ietf-ipsecme-iptfs-12.txt
A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ipsecme-iptfs-12
Looks good to me other than a typo: s/the they fall/they fall/
(but
