Balaji J writes:
> Can i know why is the DHCP allocated IP scenario not considered in
> IKEv2 RFC or any separate RFC(like RFC3456 for IKEv1)?
It was considered, but working group decided that it is too
complicated and decided to include built in support for address
allocation using configuration
Thanks Tero.
Can i know why is the DHCP allocated IP scenario not considered in IKEv2 RFC
or any separate RFC(like RFC3456 for IKEv1)?
Is it only because of CONFIG_PAYLOAD is capable of providing IP to IRAC
during IKEv2 negotiation itself.
What happens when some corporate network providing vpn se
Balaji J writes:
> Recently i have started reading the IKEv2 RFC(5996).
> I need a clarification on assigning the ip address using ikev2 protocol as
> below which i couldn't find in the RFC4718:
Note that RFC5996 is more resent than RFC4718 and RFC5996 obsoletes
both RFC4306 and RFC4718, so not al
Hi ppl,
Recently i have started reading the IKEv2 RFC(5996).
I need a clarification on assigning the ip address using ikev2 protocol as
below which i couldn't find in the RFC4718:
Is it valid to assign 0.0.0.0 IP address in the CFG_REPLY paylaod in
IKE_AUTH message to the initiator?
I need this i
