Daniel Migault wrote:
>> It there any reason to wonder if this is a magic choice for
>> compression?
> The selection of the specific values was not based on any particular
> reasons. With LSB compression, the larger the network prefix in the TS,
> the greater the potential fo
Hi,
This version has addresses all comments received so far. There is one
aspect that remains to be resolved. draft-ietf-ipsecme-diet-esp defines
a way to compress the DSCP field. Initially DSCP fields associated to
the SA were negociated by the draft-mglt-ipsecme-dscp-np. We considered
inclu
Hi Michael,
Thanks for the comments. Please see comments and responses inline.
Yours,
Daniel
On 2025-01-25 14:27, Michael Richardson wrote:
I have read draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-diet-esp-extension and
draft-ietf-ipsecme-diet-esp. It's been a long time since I last read them.
I found them rea
I have read draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-diet-esp-extension and
draft-ietf-ipsecme-diet-esp. It's been a long time since I last read them.
I found them reasonably well written, and seem to be detailed enough to
implement.. but... I'd like to see have a few more examples in the diet-esp
document, an
Hi,
As a follow-up regarding the recent modifications implemented so far,
please find attached the current version of the draft [1] along with the
diff view compared to the one in WGLC [2].
Yours,
Daniel
[1]https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mglt/draft-mglt-ipsecme-ikev2-diet-esp-extension/re
Hi Valery,
Thanks for the additional guidance. We will update the drafts and share
them shortly.
Yours,
Daniel
On 2025-01-17 03:16, Valery Smyslov wrote:
Hi Daniel,
thank you for the explanation, please see inline.
Hi Valery,
Thanks for your review. We will promptly address your comment
Hi Daniel,
thank you for the explanation, please see inline.
Hi Valery,
Thanks for your review. We will promptly address your comment and update the
draft. Please let me respond to your questions/reviews below.
Yours,
Daniel
On 2025-01-16 08:11, Valery Smyslov wrote:
Hi,
Hi Valery,
Thanks for your review. We will promptly address your comment and update
the draft. Please let me respond to your questions/reviews below.
Yours,
Daniel
On 2025-01-16 08:11, Valery Smyslov wrote:
Hi,
I reviewed draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-diet-esp-extension.
Summary: I don't think
Hi,
I reviewed draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-diet-esp-extension.
Summary: I don't think that the document is ready.
With the current text I have trouble reading it as implementer.
Issues:
1. Section 2.
Certain AfRG have already been
established during the SA negotiation process through IKEv2.
