Hi Yoav,
> I have noticed that StrongSwan is [not] implementing clustering.
Starting with the recently released 4.4.0, we provide an experimental
clustering feature. Using the terms from the draft, it is a "Tight
Completely Transparent Load Sharing Cluster".
Most work has been done before the HA
Sorry for the dual post. Some mail client problem.
___
IPsec mailing list
IPsec@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
Hoffman
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 5:13 AM
To: Yaron Sheffer; ipsec
Subject: Re: [IPsec] IPsec HA problem statement
At 5:27 PM +0300 4/26/10, Yaron Sheffer wrote:
>There has been very little follow-on discussion on this draft, just a
>few mails related to one proposed solution. So if y
the same as the ones that are already listed in the
draft, but it would still be great if we had heard it from them.
-Original Message-
From: ipsec-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipsec-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Paul
Hoffman
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 5:13 AM
To: Yaron Sheffer; ipsec
At 5:27 PM +0300 4/26/10, Yaron Sheffer wrote:
>There has been very little follow-on discussion on this draft, just a
>few mails related to one proposed solution. So if you've read the draft
>and think it's complete and good to go into WGLC, let us all know. If
>some things are still missing, tell
Hi,
There has been very little follow-on discussion on this draft, just a
few mails related to one proposed solution. So if you've read the draft
and think it's complete and good to go into WGLC, let us all know. If
some things are still missing, tell us which. Different vendors have
different vie
