On Jan 25, 2010, at 1:44 PM, Tero Kivinen wrote:
> Yoav Nir writes:
>
>> Issue #141 - Silently deleting the Child SA after a CHILD_SA_NOT_FOUND
>> ==
>> Section 2.25: "A peer that receives a CHILD_SA_NOT_FOUND
>> notification SH
Valery Smyslov writes:
> I would suugest replacing current text from draft-07:
>
>For ESP and AH, a single Child SA negotiation results in two security
>associations (one in each direction). Keying material MUST be taken
>from th
Yoav Nir writes:
> Issue #138 - Calculations involving Ni/Nr
> =
> Section 2.14: "only the first 64 bits of Ni and the first 64 bits of
> Nr are used in the calculation". This section has two calculations
> involving Ni/Nr, but this sentence should only apply
Yoav Nir writes:
> Issue #139 - Keying material taken in the order for RoHC
>
> One of the differences between RFC 4306 and the IKEv2bis draft is in
Section 2.17, Generating Key Material for Child SAs. Appendix E.2 of the
IKEv2bis draft indi
Hi all
We would like to begin closing IKEv2bis issue at a faster rate than we are
opening new ones. Paul has sent the list a several issues. Some we have
discussed, others - not so much. Here's a summary of three issues, which I
think are ready for closure.
Issue #138 - Calculations involvin
